From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Nicolas Petton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#30039: 26.0.90; [26.1] Making my code warning free is impossible with when-let Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 09:16:10 +0100 Message-ID: <87h8rv1m7p.fsf@petton.fr> References: <87zi5njxvd.fsf@cassou.me> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1515485779 25102 195.159.176.226 (9 Jan 2018 08:16:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 08:16:19 +0000 (UTC) To: Damien Cassou , 30039@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 09 09:16:14 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eYp4p-0005sa-Sz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 09:16:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37471 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eYp6l-0004rq-K7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 03:18:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56691) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eYp5l-0004Dk-D0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 03:17:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eYp5i-0007To-Pn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 03:17:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:33379) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eYp5i-0007Tf-I8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 03:17:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eYp5i-0007aV-C7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 03:17:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Nicolas Petton Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 08:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30039 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 30039-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B30039.151548578129096 (code B ref 30039); Tue, 09 Jan 2018 08:17:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 30039) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jan 2018 08:16:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42060 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eYp53-0007ZC-7V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 03:16:21 -0500 Original-Received: from petton.fr ([89.234.186.68]:51292) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eYp51-0007Yw-9p for 30039@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 03:16:19 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87zi5njxvd.fsf@cassou.me> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=petton.fr; s=mail; t=1515485773; bh=rQYKlzioQAWnNWWtP5+2MufWPQRsJlBp8C8zRNW1+zI=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=hdHRi0ZoEAhQnKj2DIkTUU4eqVgIhi5YxLriPI88+5FHS5or1B+qIIwo7KgV6ZqPyasjTQ/8mre2Eb94bTGfBGL1lb2JgwMauHsceBqDCiqZ4sIhJEI2tjRa7EgbwBQ2paLo9zRN7Nzz0eFPUuQFDWRWV6iU9ety/5SVfkWZe4M= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:141920 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Damien Cassou writes: > Hi, Hi Damien, > I can think of two solutions to make my life easier (and potentially > other package maintainers who care about code quality): > > - introduce when-let* (and if-let*) in Emacs 25; or That's probably not an option. > - un-deprecate when-let (and if-let) in Emacs 26 and re-deprecate it > later. I'm facing the same issue, un-deprecating when-let would also make my CI happier. Cheers, Nico --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE1AWqLIYsVPF+7mvg6LzXhmr8+XgFAlpUekoACgkQ6LzXhmr8 +XjiWAgA1WeUyL7lfSXOC6dVtyjfcHMJVl4gnT/4GcFSniPz7OxkEpu3Y5X49JDy oCbNyHc6Bl9J8MgGUFJNHd4g5uOeup61cKARqCH4x6NWU3Gi8tMqtiATOGN6FzMW q9A20fhVX+nvS3z6ClKkQ/3oEQzdcGOPuEnBBKyWHE6mFrNuPNm9Kj/eCWHLO8aD x2LHiwILYsraFwWlNp0Bgvtq6WHrH3z2AFisMkY8MKAv3q2YBRJe9xXYNcUfh2Ka H9lCxsYQwr4OEoi5j7CN1NqFZAtSkQ+rCOreOqCFXNk2TXOsGlGlV1ctfXEKJ+xt mbJmwDkJj7pwX4Scjy1RdXCZbkumow== =kRco -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--