From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6491: 24.0.50; list-buffers should not throw away marks Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 11:11:35 +0800 Message-ID: <87h846n3x4.7.fsf@jidanni.org> References: <87d3vjqtta.fsf@jidanni.org> <5C89778B3B7B41ED879CE82090933E46@us.oracle.com> <87v9ss747g.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="189765"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 6491@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 18 05:15:20 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iLIjY-000nFQ-8z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 05:15:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34930 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iLIjW-0005s1-B4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 23:15:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60768) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iLIjM-0005nr-C9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 23:15:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iLIjL-0005o6-AU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 23:15:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40295) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iLIjJ-0005nQ-2M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 23:15:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iLIjG-0002dC-FC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 23:15:04 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87d3vjqtta.fsf@jidanni.org> Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 03:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6491 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 6491-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6491.157136844610019 (code B ref 6491); Fri, 18 Oct 2019 03:15:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6491) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Oct 2019 03:14:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49113 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iLIiL-0002bW-Tq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 23:14:06 -0400 Original-Received: from brown.elm.relay.mailchannels.net ([23.83.212.23]:16862) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iLIiI-0002az-Q6 for 6491@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 23:14:04 -0400 X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Original-Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98D8B5A09FD; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 03:14:00 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a38.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-6-135.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.6.135]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EB2F65A0E1F; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 03:13:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Original-Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a38.g.dreamhost.com ([TEMPUNAVAIL]. [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.18.5); Fri, 18 Oct 2019 03:14:00 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Scare-Absorbed: 2eabb4507117284d_1571368440363_1675046740 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1571368440363:2914345129 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1571368440362 Original-Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a38.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a38.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 790039502D; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 20:13:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=jidanni.org; bh=vbzNd8S8Z3phFl6fzQ0/TLk4qeI=; b=MkXD3EUfzDzYr ojbs5F+G+1iiPbwORm5jlswqnEDyl/AzS+U8buHI7HPAxjvFhpfGqUUGkpG33tJ6 C3IfQL4ESndpoyieJRqb//NKB35BeCuiWGv7aDwATnbNhrUU8rGNzAQFnb9yDxyb yMDLK9KcG0mZ1GKrxVoaGdjLZCgSW8= Original-Received: from jidanni.org (39-10-37-167.adsl.fetnet.net [39.10.37.167]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a38.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 56D3195043; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 20:13:53 -0700 (PDT) X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a38 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:169628 Archived-At: >>>>> "LI" == Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: LI> "Drew Adams" writes: >>> I think it may be logical for the marks to go away if you re-list the >>> buffers, but I'm not sure. Does anybody have an opinion on this? >> >> Relisting (e.g. `g') does erase all marks in *Buffer List*. >> >> I'm not sure it should, however. Seems to me that Dired should perhaps be the >> model here, and `g' does *not* erase marks in Dired. LI> I've now made this change in Emacs 27. LI> As for `v' removing the marks -- it's done that since forever, as far as LI> I can see, and it's done on purpose, so I think making it stop doing LI> that might be a behavioural change that won't be welcome. LI> But I don't know -- does anybody have an opinion? It's trivial to fix. Docstring ""v runs the command Buffer-menu-select (found in Buffer-menu-mode-map),"" doesn't even mention it throws away the marks.