From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#3447: suggest minibuffer M-< go to start of text Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 08:47:54 +0100 Message-ID: <87h835mvh1.fsf@gnus.org> References: <873aajttak.fsf@blah.blah> <87d0fidwfl.fsf@gnus.org> <87sgmshhu0.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <871rucv4o3.fsf@gnus.org> <87eeyblbof.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83r22a608c.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="7041"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 3447@debbugs.gnu.org, user42@zip.com.au, Juri Linkov To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 15 08:49:16 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iVWLz-0001eN-9f for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 08:49:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36284 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVWLx-00036V-NA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 02:49:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38196) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVWLo-00036C-OA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 02:49:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVWLn-0000LR-ON for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 02:49:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54924) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVWLn-0000LL-LO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 02:49:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iVWLn-0003Xf-EC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 02:49:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 07:49:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 3447 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch fixed Original-Received: via spool by 3447-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B3447.157380409313558 (code B ref 3447); Fri, 15 Nov 2019 07:49:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 3447) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Nov 2019 07:48:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35512 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iVWKz-0003Wc-BT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 02:48:13 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:39122) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iVWKx-0003W8-Ms for 3447@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 02:48:12 -0500 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iVWKh-0003Yx-Nh; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 08:47:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83r22a608c.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 14 Nov 2019 15:44:51 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:171629 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Eli, do you think it would be better to change the default >> because 'C-a' and already go to the end of the prompt? > > No, because you are actually removing any way for users to go to the > beginning of the minibuffer. Doesn't hitting `M-<' twice go to the start of the minibuffer with the new code? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no