From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#29799: 24.5; cl-loop guard clause missing Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 13:55:26 +0100 Message-ID: <87h82wrry9.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87d138beur.fsf@gmail.com> <87pnhkke27.fsf@dick> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="66054"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 29799@debbugs.gnu.org, Tino Calancha , npostavs@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: dick.r.chiang@gmail.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 22 13:56:16 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iY8Tv-000H3q-SH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 13:56:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50350 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iY8Tu-0004yy-Kf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 07:56:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49581) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iY8Tl-0004wC-KI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 07:56:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iY8Tj-0003p5-62 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 07:56:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45088) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iY8Ti-0003p1-N3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 07:56:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iY8Ti-0002ru-3Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 07:56:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 12:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 29799 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 29799-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B29799.157442734010993 (code B ref 29799); Fri, 22 Nov 2019 12:56:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 29799) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Nov 2019 12:55:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53909 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iY8TM-0002rF-3W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 07:55:40 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:48488) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iY8TJ-0002r2-V8 for 29799@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 07:55:38 -0500 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iY8T9-00037Z-Kz; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 13:55:30 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87pnhkke27.fsf@dick> (dick r. chiang's message of "Thu, 21 Nov 2019 18:25:04 -0500") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:172229 Archived-At: dick.r.chiang@gmail.com writes: > I noticed the following cases stopped working after commit a036543. > > ;; should not fail > (cl-loop for i from 1 upto 100 and j = 1 then (1+ j) > do (cl-assert (= i j) t) > until (> j 10)) > > ;; should return (1 0) > (cl-loop with result > for x below 3 > for y below 2 > and z = (progn (push x result) nil) > finally return result) I applied the patch and ran that test case, and it returned (2 1 0). But shouldn't it return (2 1)? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no