From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41879: 28.0.50; [Patch]: Add project-switch-to-buffer in project.el Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 22:58:12 +0100 Message-ID: <87h7van05n.fsf@tcd.ie> References: <87bllk2pfc.fsf@thornhill.no> <87sgew7zni.fsf@thornhill.no> <1a426f88-dd6e-77f7-bcbf-30ced285537d@yandex.ru> <87o8pj8sy2.fsf@thornhill.no> <87d05zr13x.fsf@warpmail.net> <87lfkn8q0a.fsf@thornhill.no> <87mu53i9xf.fsf@tcd.ie> <87o8pjkuld.fsf@thornhill.no> <87366vun16.fsf@tcd.ie> <87imfrkl5o.fsf@thornhill.no> <87h7varhz6.fsf@tcd.ie> <98a353cf-407b-0eeb-c564-0adc977973de@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="72054"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 41879@debbugs.gnu.org, "Philip K." , Theodor Thornhill To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 16 23:59:12 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jlJbr-000IeV-G2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 23:59:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44952 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlJbq-0003Ps-Ek for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 17:59:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42510) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlJbi-0003Pl-PZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 17:59:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38252) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlJbi-00043N-GE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 17:59:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jlJbi-0004vs-7M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 17:59:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 21:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41879 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 41879-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41879.159234470218911 (code B ref 41879); Tue, 16 Jun 2020 21:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41879) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jun 2020 21:58:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49798 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jlJb4-0004ux-KM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 17:58:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-f41.google.com ([209.85.128.41]:34373) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jlJb2-0004uj-Oe for 41879@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 17:58:21 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-f41.google.com with SMTP id u26so3140431wmn.1 for <41879@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:58:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tcd-ie.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=ZwkQoMW56s71UyfarJVWqAwh2LorBf9VWwkTzl15FVk=; b=ABlBCAa4Yp+9t3QsrFdes1U1a2jxlbxrmHLOklNYY8sqvqhvd/WT61M2n2x3L78SZI bpplspSknxc3LkzeXt6GJt0DNi0W/DDkyywrFBOxcbqmY7EspSUmUFzJjKBVyvG1wSHX j/RzjcWuuDtYXwb2MntajNFGjvzH4xPmaDZdNNIjennkrZMd1RbNDBXNX513WuNqRBb9 kNJJF+PqtJIJMv5/aCA9BKbAqB5c7RArmaRLBUoVuxiTmxN3bODjBoWnPyaWjY5rmFIH 9cXQ0CwHQ+X7DqFn14SZNMu6MVxwbGinenqxliIBLjLJcjx1cxLIBigqdBrCapvtMj1U 5gxg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=ZwkQoMW56s71UyfarJVWqAwh2LorBf9VWwkTzl15FVk=; b=fb01wbIuFAxLKRa+dLsedzQRHmiHQMoMV/l/Xx1f0T2uPYp9PNUzcP70fUz1YegsyJ ylVoguXLc448O795LvqUaJ69aoRaX1DCYmZ02x2Je1gDQ/eex/XZ7la9kmdJnpNioIpm TlFvYcrGgQz7ILh8Y/binxTdWEOMUJDJesMrw8VSfckUVNdmgeZmcfwwwDe2OHioAdoc yiA3ACQ9apDvr85am7809Y8QxafvKfOR8y7/vQrfLWRdZ9PDRnuzJnTrNdwbF1vxTtq0 9t7QztivW5ng7RREElN6UP7gJXRg5QQ9RGp+4JVwJ+u89eZeyF69a/CZECE+jcZcAwKq e0FQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530m6SBPb82r5zmstYqL4lgkwgqd+iLIT4xh7rGyaOtV3zAbjvFE NdULFczCdKD5jCRbDjPdtRPNJQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz0M2CkgvwBx/1M56b4I46DPtMGFgCvdNWeghDHjO9UXQqlCJXg+zgklK78WMwk5RNf7VE7cw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:544d:: with SMTP id p13mr5564854wmi.25.1592344694752; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:58:14 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([2a02:8084:20e2:c380:92bd:1bfd:38fc:fae2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g18sm5777034wme.17.2020.06.16.14.58.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:58:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <98a353cf-407b-0eeb-c564-0adc977973de@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Wed, 17 Jun 2020 00:40:25 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:182050 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov writes: > On 16.06.2020 21:19, Basil L. Contovounesios wrote: >> ;; BUFFER is an entry (BUF-NAME . BUF-OBJ) of Vbuffer_alist. > > I don't think we can/should refer to C level variables from Lisp documentation. This is a source comment, not public documentation, and the relevant code relies on an undocumented C-level implementation detail (the use of Vbuffer_alist as a completion collection in read-buffer) so I think the comment (or something along those lines; feel free to suggest improvements) is appropriate. -- Basil