From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Philip K." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#42386: [PATCH] Handle symbols in project-kill-buffers-ignores Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 20:00:58 +0200 Message-ID: <87h7u7uyp1.fsf@warpmail.net> References: <878sfjkh8o.fsf@warpmail.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36946"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 42386@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 16 20:02:17 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jw8Cz-0009ST-HQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 20:02:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38450 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jw8Cy-0005GX-9b for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 14:02:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49236) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jw8Cp-0005FJ-Lb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 14:02:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44384) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jw8Cn-00014V-Te for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 14:02:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jw8Cn-0003mx-SV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 14:02:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Philip K." Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 18:02:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42386 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 42386-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42386.159492247114481 (code B ref 42386); Thu, 16 Jul 2020 18:02:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 42386) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jul 2020 18:01:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55919 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jw8By-0003lV-SJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 14:01:11 -0400 Original-Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:58293) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jw8Bw-0003lH-Eb for 42386@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 14:01:09 -0400 Original-Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B55F05C0237; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 14:01:02 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 16 Jul 2020 14:01:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=warpmail.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=fm3; bh=wJaGIJ3/LBWEMdCduod8Ubk3Bc8kq9LtpF9s8r2 2AFY=; b=ea20cTCYrCVEBT603TrSXNQsAbbD4H/P+d2ShitRWPLzdDnClQdD27r 6dE4OKJx3XyIvpeDlLDXdhN3pkl2EMyZX16wDi+729lj3RzkPa7AYmr7djKaCxQV f4OIVEM9zNs65d675hntvdxJktJoBRYPu6ElCcq+GisDBlZd7XzRNQPaGLG6vYUk gOqFdKRs9oJfaLNE0qDaisHn06l3UAzqTBhrZSg3GBwVb/ebVEDqp7OGyRU1CgSE pTa1nj6ZQ8kvxsF4LFU/i9RC5qo5SedFTevWc09GHeoTy500V8Uk3andB6LmtS/t bfozUVUcpBIX+47JBQkPgdeU3J0+3SQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=wJaGIJ3/LBWEMdCdu od8Ubk3Bc8kq9LtpF9s8r22AFY=; b=fWfbYeAiMxnS8liqkk5W0d1pghJ+NtgVx Y7Tse5qI+yBIDsm4kdu2WzPmnQgtCwtiknzMXsuUEOlymd1EmMsEbPIrNXLfCDde 7QZVaZyaA7B7lHSu2LpYHgZ34ThMMqNEqdoYMT7bMwh+eGgWsQmGl9IIJhhgdoC9 iPZYd+Pnk4pnAJZO8h7zNuQ0q+rhuADDBSYNkHOU8GXe65byh9wImi3lxh3KLNno 6QmmMripKD3W8lvM6uAyrECfPwWv/F1nNRx2wlQHP/3eyWSsrW8Fuq6UcKvP5KZ8 3mJ9tU4241J8r+upmTZdxXEorUUKjTzmrTzz9o0EvVu7npLLgDi5Q== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrfeeggdduvdduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufgjfffkgggtsehttdertddttddtnecuhfhrohhmpedfrfhhihhlihhp ucfmrddfuceophhhihhlihhpseifrghrphhmrghilhdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg hrnhepheeuieffveevkeetffeufeekfeejkeekkeefjeelueeftdduffdugfeuieegfffh necukfhppeekjedrudeghedrtddrudehieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurf grrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehphhhilhhiphesfigrrhhpmhgrihhlrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Original-Received: from localhost (p5791009c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.145.0.156]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id AB82E3280060; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 14:01:01 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (message from Dmitry Gutov on Thu, 16 Jul 2020 16:43:36 +0300) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:183099 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov writes: > On 16.07.2020 11:15, Philip K. wrote: >> using project-kill-buffers for the last few weeks I noticed that my ERC >> buffers get killed when I started my session in a project. This kicks me >> out of all the channels I have joined, which is not intended. >> >> Fixing this is easy, I just have to ignore ERC buffers: >> >> (add-to-list 'project-kill-buffers-ignores >> (lambda (buf) >> (with-current-buffer buf >> (derived-mode-p 'erc-mode)))) > > So there is no way to match the buffers in question using a regexp by name? Not in this case, because an ERC buffer can have any name (direct conversations don't start with a "#"). -- Philip K.