From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Yoni Rabkin Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: version numbers in ELPA Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 12:11:03 -0500 Message-ID: <87h7ma8vrs.fsf@rabkins.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38691"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 17 18:12:44 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lCQNW-0009tO-QT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 18:12:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52734 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCQNV-0002Qq-Rk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 12:12:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40968) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCQM3-0001AB-AG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 12:11:11 -0500 Original-Received: from smtprelay0094.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.94]:47474 helo=smtprelay.hostedemail.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCQLz-0001op-J8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 12:11:11 -0500 Original-Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (clb03-v110.bra.tucows.net [216.40.38.60]) by smtprelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E26918384366 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 17:11:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Session-Marker: 796F6E69407261626B696E732E6E6574 X-HE-Tag: floor16_3d072a72764e X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1158 Original-Received: from greenriver.rabkins.net (c-73-238-99-162.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.238.99.162]) (Authenticated sender: yoni@rabkins.net) by omf15.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 17:11:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Ethics: Use GNU Received-SPF: none client-ip=216.40.44.94; envelope-from=yoni@rabkins.net; helo=smtprelay.hostedemail.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:265022 Archived-At: Hello all, As I'm preparing another release of rt-liberation for ELPA I noticed that in my code I have: ;; Version: 2.01 ...but ELPA displays it, and makes the directories under ~/.emacs.d/elpa, as "2.1". So when I release 2.02, it will probably turn into 2.2... which might be confusing if I ever try to release an actual 2.2.... Are there some implicit rules to follow as to how we should number versions going to ELPA? Are there some explicit rules I just skimmed over and didn't take note of? thanks -- "Cut your own wood and it will warm you twice"