From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sanel Zukan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47318: 26.3; Modules on Emacs 26.3 broken? Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 22:41:32 +0100 Message-ID: <87h7l15z03.fsf@example.com> References: <87ft0n2uxt.fsf@example.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21514"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Notmuch/0.28.2 (https://notmuchmail.org) Cc: 47318@debbugs.gnu.org To: Philipp Stephani Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 23 22:42:12 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lOomy-0005Tk-4U for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 22:42:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34812 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOomv-0001BK-Mi for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 17:42:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43998) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOomo-0001AU-Sd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 17:42:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49930) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOomo-0004DG-LI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 17:42:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lOomo-0002XP-Hx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 17:42:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Sanel Zukan Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 21:42:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47318 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 47318-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47318.16165357029727 (code B ref 47318); Tue, 23 Mar 2021 21:42:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47318) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Mar 2021 21:41:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33243 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lOomU-0002Wp-Js for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 17:41:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-f46.google.com ([209.85.128.46]:52771) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lOomS-0002Wb-Db for 47318@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 17:41:41 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-f46.google.com with SMTP id d191so11844724wmd.2 for <47318@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 14:41:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=N9G1oqHQYgax2dIYp1VbN8MpubSbPybVdIQS1HwFgms=; b=D7miiwC7kW9WOxDWztKAbz+mgjbAwNvVfVlbu9yE0R9gze/+HfhhQKcQqubpI8sL7r tbX4bfXOkxi0RmEdBCqrLhpLTnduWVlbFf+jzG63Al2mOQ7D/JihJ8xx+zkj3+RDwVQ1 HJ0x4b79Fswh1Wo4K8OJL4rh8XVm28JDAhsn/2rH0pA7tYAD9ks+GNuomHxepYB6MDkr yCJAaX6Z8FG2Y7YY9uqf+UVWLrnWUmYtmw7N+8ErtnDea6nvYf19DrX/Ak336rcPxkmL wAEAsk+ruYs6mTrMJg+1Tl4Y8nfnqA8vFwgvkDbC2eKId7I2gp3s9SqECqcQ8MsuJnN+ oFnQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=N9G1oqHQYgax2dIYp1VbN8MpubSbPybVdIQS1HwFgms=; b=IVH5m2HDKUNiw1M5LUb5rAs8gVGvE5GDNYTOs8YprewCE8pIrTFDKfAx+TGWddo6BZ VbSD+lWxQy74H6eAUExaftCJBojB3AJxEzWtHYHPRB+QFZlV72ISFU/brWfRoOGFCyeQ CZmMl7/vMM1n4m2mc3r9kK7yhPBf6Hefl8sg8BljUrRIxSnhrR3NNnEQBDePiriOqNZQ 87jd+sF1pUnSoExs9SZtT1VhFNtnA7ihDqsavANYfW3KmdVBK1YPb99kbuhjKfUiDRxW BZSTuyAQYZ/ffXnfRx10QIDPkPN1Cto56yF3CF5w7VN4YiXjs2iugnATE3U1hdpfSWn0 dSFA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532KuGc+uYEOWC7qyocDZOOCQ1gPl/FqbiWxZ9CYKln0PjMXWqJG 22YbhyDcU8iAKokOpW2IGOc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwBuaxOz7p/kVn20gj+aZCTkH86Ch3Hb5WfZX0A3mCY0zGAUu8mQaILkEQk61ng01dkWLqY8Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3643:: with SMTP id y3mr34800wmq.159.1616535694272; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 14:41:34 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([185.13.240.217]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h8sm198299wrt.94.2021.03.23.14.41.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 23 Mar 2021 14:41:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:202925 Archived-At: Hi Philipp, Thanks for your fast reply. I tried that; it will return 't,' but no symbols are visible in Emacs. Tried with modules-tut [3] example and emacs-libvterm. Any idea what could go wrong? Best regards, Sanel Philipp Stephani writes: > Am Mo., 22. M=C3=A4rz 2021 um 14:14 Uhr schrieb Sanel Zukan : >> >> Hi guys, >> >> I'm getting this [1] error from freshly compiled Emacs 26.3 and >> vterm-module. >> >> Also, emacs-eject [2] and very simple module [3] fails on 26.3 with the >> similar error. However, they are working fine on 27.1. >> >> Any idea what could go wrong? I also tried to run bare Emacs with >> 'emacs -Q'. In the all cases, Emacs is compiled with modules support. >> >> [1] https://github.com/akermu/emacs-libvterm/issues/181 >> [2] https://github.com/syohex/emacs-eject >> [3] http://diobla.info/blog-archive/modules-tut.html >> > > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D30164 is probably at > least part of the answer. > However, loading modules in general should still work, even in Emacs > 26. Do you also get errors when loading the module file directly with > `load' instead of `require'?