From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Easy configuration of a site-lisp directory Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 11:13:49 +0000 Message-ID: <87h7fd93pu.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87y29cj65y.fsf@posteo.net> <87tujgv7y1.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11116"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 25 13:14:45 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mIqrk-0002f4-S4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 13:14:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36088 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIqrj-0006sM-Rm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 07:14:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56142) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIqqz-0004lR-1C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 07:13:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:51403) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIqqw-0005qz-KQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 07:13:56 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34DFA240026 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 13:13:51 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1629890031; bh=k8+YcTwxWu/LayLb88sxQ305ju9+80ss6VfuRIr8Upw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:Date:From; b=CqcF+s8/bJueTRmeXcT7amfSDBC41N9oZWuBaRuhfSoxcRG4bkaOUW1Lf16w8Jnzt 8jzbfyTILwVh2Y6nnau13m1gM7eXkcJiHcXrtd0/xwBvlQOqgVpvnpl7cIdJQcF9ia nMmQzsTBm3qsyZMIC8FGAJr4LsB4JKeqTmmTFxhZTNTFxlDpWZdnipiHgeov/tskug LyWWPf/PjSZeo02ZXItCWPsAmik1MBeDT01kyLHBnZ8VqNN80M66f6e8hrDuaM7TK1 6SCtmz0RVkYzx8uAEdcWm4tXewoHcVQMvcBBhCdiMooACd1Tpk3rT2yxlaa45upZM9 qP8eQT4tAK1VQ== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4Gvjz23LbFz9rxT; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 13:13:50 +0200 (CEST) Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mDMEYHHqUhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAp3GdmYJ6tm5McweY6dEvIYIiry+Oz9rU4MH6NHWK0Ee0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiQBBMWCAA4FiEEDM2H44ZoPt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwMFCwkIBwIGFQoJ CAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQtVrAHPRh1FyTkgEAjlbGPxFchvMbxzAES3r8QLuZgCxeAXunM9gh io0ePtUBALVhh9G6wIoZhl0gUCbQpoN/UJHI08Gm1qDob5zDxnIHuDgEYHHqUhIKKwYBBAGXVQEF AQEHQNcRB+MUimTMqoxxMMUERpOR+Q4b1KgncDZkhrO2ql1tAwEIB4h4BBgWCAAgFiEEDM2H44Zo Pt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwwACgkQtVrAHPRh1Fw1JwD/Qo7kvtib8jy7puyWrSv0MeTS g8qIxgoRWJE/KKdkCLEA/jb9b9/g8nnX+UcwHf/4VfKsjExlnND3FrBviXUW6NcB In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 24 Aug 2021 17:35:26 -0400") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:272963 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > Max Brieiev [2021-08-23 12:14:46] wrote: >> So is there any conclusion in this long thread about preferable setup >> for the case described in the original post? And making local git >> repositeries be package.el aware. > > From my point of view, the "preferable setup" is for someone to spice up > `elpa-admin.el` to make it more user-friendly for that use-case. I could look into this, because I was intending to work on elpa-admin.el a bit anyway. But this would mean that it wouldn't work OOTB, right? -- Philip Kaludercic