From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Taiju HIGASHI Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add an option to not reduce vocabulary of the Japanese Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2022 20:46:06 +0900 Message-ID: <87h750tzwh.fsf@taiju.info> References: <87r146o2rt.fsf@taiju.info> <8335gme0ml.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6auz1p4.fsf@taiju.info> <83pmjqc89p.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfolwyzj.fsf@taiju.info> <83ee04bz70.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21116"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: handa@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 04 13:48:51 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nxSGx-0005JZ-8e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2022 13:48:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34228 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nxSGu-0002FR-SN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2022 07:48:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59212) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nxSES-0001L5-1W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2022 07:46:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pj1-x102e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::102e]:33427) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nxSEP-0005Is-1u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2022 07:46:15 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pj1-x102e.google.com with SMTP id hv24-20020a17090ae41800b001e33eebdb5dso8730739pjb.0 for ; Sat, 04 Jun 2022 04:46:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=taiju-info.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=FF7Uh7QZorMo3MkLGX0JQ6rTqHBeUpmdYwYcH5TBP/8=; b=D5ybO7r7aMGb0ccNb2w7Jr3v6n5tfsxOc5xWDTDm047rWaHvdUZsdCETe9HYdmiGCI GY820Ce9EKM1bTmU7ooRAqM/mdLwn5X0CiT8gVMqUDJpkkUQPH5cNSZFmZU1V5VCWJZA fpdNASl5mpsCzhqke7binLngdhggpZxTomYzEcGySJ+RkQiBUlYhyB3jhKBakILgDlq8 iRIvSuqRdyu5BzAXNbmGdI7YNlltVvxtA/+uCJZrNXnCvwpvExq5AoYZp/YhwoR//RDQ S+zCfXEwoH1fnheQI3CzDVwRp3nU3f4ZHKYizLfdzNDBjLS3Edsm2jxyF0Be5BpREcd7 yYzw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=FF7Uh7QZorMo3MkLGX0JQ6rTqHBeUpmdYwYcH5TBP/8=; b=Tf6mCSR4R0OG/ovTgYnI6DPJc8O9kJ4+vrq+vox9aWT3m4TCYppEWUEDpiZ4sZj6wm KTys6xON8ZaRGssNU/pX5tdIgnhrPrvCW5MbVx+MMSX0lZmPwfWN/4vliSP1xlmLb7PG lu3KJT9Tq+r/ed1+RZSigXVhp3evQE9giHyGrWNny45YCSP6pB4O2I158W4ohfJFregn UcDU8G59Ietpb5uGnnfEb4rlIwdfRlwS3qBOtYmvtpx3skYS+Pw16d39uS/IPOhMzj9d ct0r4VaDzG4tNqk1smcPrjCZE2bp+Q71dQES+u0qu58+2MMuyTyNN3bSPYxtnkFR+sVD XMtA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531lFZBUtfyucNvfSXKSuYWdGbFh0IRGzH9TWFKkBPmQ/Y2sbPXq xNas/dx04+wb6c4QcGNGkb/7hb64eSoIIkEN X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxIhtKN5ad2JWwJOC1vVXNxJxpA4SM5fo0p0PjVBLvrBRruUTBaEXnFNEbNfi5kTKi1ekZvKg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:33c5:b0:1e3:e57a:8998 with SMTP id lk5-20020a17090b33c500b001e3e57a8998mr15700117pjb.54.1654343169665; Sat, 04 Jun 2022 04:46:09 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Taix ([240b:253:ec40:2400:b7d1:436e:2d61:e925]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 19-20020a170902e9d300b001641670d1adsm7043821plk.131.2022.06.04.04.46.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 04 Jun 2022 04:46:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83ee04bz70.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 04 Jun 2022 11:38:43 +0300") Received-SPF: none client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::102e; envelope-from=higashi@taiju.info; helo=mail-pj1-x102e.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:290648 Archived-At: > I thought no changes were needed, because one could already say > something like > > make ja-dic.el JA_DIC_REDUCTION='' > > Wouldn't that work? Perhaps in lisp/Makefile.in one should make sure > the JA_DIC_REDUCTION value was propagated to the sub-make running in > leim/, but that's all. > > Am I missing something? > > Thanks. I may not have understood it properly. Did you imagine that the special rules for re-generating would be implemented in lisp/Makefile? In that case, are you saying that there is no need to modify the leim/Makefile? Certainly, if that is the case, you may be right. For example, what about the idea of adding regenerate-ja-dic and regenerate-ja-dic-without-reductoin as new special rules in lisp/Makefile? These rules are intended to be independent of the existing state and are always intended to rules that can reliably regenerate dictionaries with reduced vocabularies or without vocabulary reduction. If that is the case, there should be no changes to the previous patch, only new rules added. Sorry if I missed the point. Thank you, -- Taiju