From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: [External] : view-remove-frame-by-deleting ignored? Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 21:59:43 +0200 Message-ID: <87h70824pc.fsf@dataswamp.org> References: <874jwevyx8.fsf@post.rwth-aachen.de> <87sfjx6frd.fsf@web.de> <87zge4vmfp.fsf@post.rwth-aachen.de> <87y1to23q1.fsf@dataswamp.org> <878rllhn9l.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12958"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:Mtxajbj14kk7Ab6p1TB/rWNR5Xg= Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 12 22:22:30 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oiiFK-00039X-LD for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 22:22:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46790 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oiiFJ-0003ze-A2 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 16:22:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35366) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oihtT-0006ja-3Z for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 15:59:55 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:55690) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oihtR-0007i2-GF for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 15:59:54 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oihtO-0005Y3-OE for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 21:59:50 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -15 X-Spam_score: -1.6 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 16:21:30 -0400 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:139869 Archived-At: Po Lu wrote: >> I generally use 26.3, as later releases broke too much for >> me. :-( > > Too bad. I see this a lot with Emacs users as of late, where > they pick some version of Emacs that has not seen > development in years (or even decades) and stick to it, > because we break too much. Break too much, what? Old code? I have not had any such issues and the little that is reported by the byte-compiler is just interesting, rather, to fix. Like Mr Neo said, "Upgrades" ... -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal