From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#3466: 23.0.94; have `d' in debugger treat macro expansion like `c' does Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 04:04:44 +0200 Message-ID: <87h6zz2qtf.fsf_-_@web.de> References: <87pmx3463n.fsf@gnus.org> <87h7ie0ys4.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34569"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: "3466@debbugs.gnu.org" <3466@debbugs.gnu.org>, Drew Adams To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 20 04:06:25 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1olKwz-0008jT-HS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 04:06:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43350 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1olKwy-0002Eh-65 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 22:06:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [::1] (port=58588 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1olKvi-0001YT-GW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 22:05:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42580) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1olKve-0001YF-QC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 22:05:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33385) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1olKve-0001zT-I3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 22:05:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1olKve-0004JN-8U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 22:05:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 02:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 3466 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 3466-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B3466.166623149916561 (code B ref 3466); Thu, 20 Oct 2022 02:05:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 3466) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2022 02:04:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60696 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1olKva-0004J3-Vp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 22:04:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:48741) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1olKvY-0004Ir-JW for 3466@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 22:04:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=s29768273; t=1666231487; bh=aAoyAvI4+8WnOGhMjK7QQkuqSzIypDz1qN04ADyMkxY=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=VQRWOpmDnIfCT8Ujdm2Qxp3cmcb0s9RiVyWXhvbm033JU5zYeoYc16mMHtydP5Ae6 YtxJsvwu+1vQJp66Y4kmlHUOe9BNzOivBHlY/Ui69ybq4p6tw1/NSOHxiaTCmFG03/ QeMIzHB8LtE0Z37dEuwLGOQkv2dIqsnJaiVUW1LBT6CSfSEFPLyOafZuWdy8obQm1A gFStApMe+HePJzpydzKLmlQrX7cIaIqX80IiBAJarxivTj7LckTlgoZEH76/sSIqOl H0Ovh9ybQakzxhLMowayFwbVLUUVm4IKKaUZrNhzCYFDSS8WqenBmje9pOtoFKxach jk85QC5MGA2JQ== X-UI-Sender-Class: 814a7b36-bfc1-4dae-8640-3722d8ec6cd6 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([188.105.185.54]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb105 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M8kEV-1ohEJq1adN-004ax2; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 04:04:47 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87h7ie0ys4.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Fri, 04 Jun 2021 11:22:51 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:kIgqUGXA9Afjil+e8fPO7IEcLFWe0SxmdPhZAeO0nWnDoaElE+g k2xGUVK/eCL0b9uy/NYr3Ru2DkMLVcdI09oIM0f6hjqM/WcTas6zbkMU4QjxzK7heDg72IH xcPA12CA4nBxmy9eXXNjCCYu9/gJUcxhtAiXhTqKI6O2Nj03tFuaC03HQQqRhS9hnjQoZyj aM/6apvGxB4j0PYtNVnbQ== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:90BVYbs31DM=;xmf/wjCt9WjVCIMtwgQkLyvaqDT dI7GvsvU4d72eQ8zc2NlRXtfX6fxEYiN7dLtPYWNqnvPw7YHARDkXBXzV5TGxpdDF3eF0MS+B MAGuykQExz6UpOjZrXAe3eds13qCjkjil0AvS09OcGa+L7YkNwoyMokDwJBAX4/J1pbcsmjap fVcPXcGynmlXC3nKfn3Z+YIFP2AT4TGOMuoiUoJQkciuHF/1CJCEnOgdX0/0OeGCwkL/ZHL7m p6aiTfsp+zgngON98+kydyWCMZU/5vmtahjjkPiNVoMCMbZaA3XzMzhxqz/S4YWtah+TKFX/x dnhpCNeaa5dxxviOn+7K8UhXFuSZjAZAP8/SBMcMgj6jTx5FU6L3wrj0TX4N1MdRW42fDr0HN RCbCT0LS8My6OtwCE7n1+5ZvWX4zDwJrYWUZKc+dBCsIrX30iuOsojD+EApCES2Sjpm+V2p08 +P7YtwZ8RJg20agX3mbEJqC5YwVLzkeoaYaPNnQrsz1CFNsEIlFDwQOwYfCFeoLO4xrVrfR8U i0YxA2DRFUK/jLD41/ByVhP39uwe+XqIKMS1fWAZyWj7MbuR9pkYE1K2nGEG81ua+tE9pwpFp 9//YBANSqRuBmNffr00wGsT8Vtf8MNyUCs2TColdGj6rvr/v7RSXUHKI77fdOpkzfKtTyldtf k0Cqm6shlzIrPd88MJ+o1+m5Qv3hXgxiOrjSR08dvTR8qwXt4AWnhQE0n8O5hAlvF3dwK1lM/ gDrQTNdX+Ac/nWLpD0F+2Iot0hQ8CLPC3aUFCVFqEUsaeomvYGSZHFaOczbWoFQ+21mnEnoJ X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:245915 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > So here's my test case: > > (defun foo () > (dotimes (i 2) > (message "foo"))) > > and `M-x debug-on-entry' on foo, `M-: (foo)', just hitting `d' a lot > does what I'd expect -- stepping through all the code. It does not seem > to step the through the macro expansion itself. (At least not in Emacs > 27.1 or 28.) I also don't understand what Drew writes. Especially why c would do something that a repeated d would not get you to, sooner or later. Drew, did you bind c to something else? Or had your code been loaded under some special conditions? Normally what the debugger steps through doesn't contain macro calls - even for uncompiled code and even for the dynamically binding dialect. So unless you were debugging quoted lambdas, I'm ... confused. Michael.