all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Samuel Loury <konubinix@gmail.com>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: [BUG?] Matching tags: & operator no more implicit between tags and special property
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 09:57:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h6oq2nu1.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 926 bytes --]

Hi. I've been using org-mode as PKMS for 13 years. Thanks for that
awesome tool.

After upgrading on main yesterday, I realized a change of behavior. I'm
not sure whether it is a bug or not.

The following tags query used to implicitly behave as a AND
"-tag-TODO=\"TODO\"".

It does not anymore.

To reproduce this, simply use the following content.

```
* TODO todo and tag                                                  :tag:
* TODO simply todo
* nothing
* only tag                                                              :tag:
```

And run the following code.

`(org-tags-view nil "-tag-todo=\"TODO\"")`

Before commit f689eb44f175fbbdc4e8ef0ad6f5201b10863438, this showed only
"nothing", as expected.

Now, it shows all the entries.

To get back to the old behavior, I need to explicitly add the boolean
operator & in between.

I attached the code of the example in this mail.

Hope that this bug report is useful.

[-- Attachment #1.2: tag-match-implicit-and.tar.xz --]
[-- Type: application/x-xz, Size: 528 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #1.3: Type: text/plain, Size: 104 bytes --]

-- 
Konubinix
GPG Key    : 7439106A
Fingerprint: 5993 BE7A DA65 E2D9 06CE  5C36 75D2 3CED 7439 106A

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 487 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2023-08-23  7:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-23  7:57 Samuel Loury [this message]
2023-08-23 10:21 ` [BUG?] Matching tags: & operator no more implicit between tags and special property Jens Schmidt
2023-08-23 10:37   ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-08-23 10:31 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-08-23 10:38   ` Jens Schmidt
2023-08-23 14:00     ` [RFC] Quoting property names in tag/property matches [Was: [BUG?] Matching tags: & operator no more implicit between tags and special property] Jens Schmidt
2023-08-23 15:55       ` Jens Schmidt
2023-08-24  7:30         ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-08-24  7:32       ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-08-24  8:52         ` Jens Schmidt
2023-08-25 18:46           ` Jens Schmidt
2023-08-26 10:16             ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-08-26 11:53               ` Jens Schmidt
2023-08-26 12:00                 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-08-26 12:19                   ` Jens Schmidt
2023-08-26 12:22                     ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-08-26 12:54                       ` Jens Schmidt
2023-08-27  7:11                         ` Samuel Loury
2023-08-27  7:43                           ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-01 16:48                             ` Jens Schmidt
2023-09-01 23:59                               ` Tom Gillespie
2023-09-02  0:02                                 ` Tom Gillespie
2023-09-02  7:10                               ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-02 13:14                                 ` Redoing the current tag/property parser in a real grammar [was: Re: [RFC] Quoting property names in tag/property matches] Jens Schmidt
2023-09-03  7:04                                   ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-02 13:18                                 ` [RFC] Quoting property names in tag/property matches Jens Schmidt
2023-08-30 16:28                         ` [RFC] Quoting property names in tag/property matches [Was: [BUG?] Matching tags: & operator no more implicit between tags and special property] Jens Schmidt
2023-08-31  8:08                           ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-08-31 10:24                             ` Jens Schmidt
2023-09-03  6:53                         ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-03  9:25                           ` Jens Schmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87h6oq2nu1.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=konubinix@gmail.com \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.