From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [External] : Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2023 08:23:50 +0000 Message-ID: <87h6odgezt.fsf@localhost> References: <87il9kksqz.fsf@dfreeman.email> <83a5udlj47.fsf@gnu.org> <87a5udk1co.fsf@posteo.net> <835y51kslv.fsf@gnu.org> <7a82c524-1aa1-e755-e377-673ebb107a44@gutov.dev> <83r0nok8s4.fsf@gnu.org> <87il90znco.fsf@yahoo.com> <1977fbef-307b-bcf4-9448-64f26916dd65@gutov.dev> <87edjozlqq.fsf@yahoo.com> <43ddad10-49dd-1c49-ebfe-51689780b315@gutov.dev> <83jztgk410.fsf@gnu.org> <83edjojx8c.fsf@gnu.org> <8734zzv7vk.fsf@localhost> <83edjjecmx.fsf@gnu.org> <87wmxbtsd4.fsf@localhost> <83bkeneb8j.fsf@gnu.org> <87ledrtqzx.fsf@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9437"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Drew Adams , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 02 10:23:59 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qcLvD-0002Fm-B3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2023 10:23:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qcLua-0005mf-QZ; Sat, 02 Sep 2023 04:23:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qcLuW-0005lt-6A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2023 04:23:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qcLuR-0003OX-NS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2023 04:23:15 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EAA9240101 for ; Sat, 2 Sep 2023 10:23:10 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1693642990; bh=vjrjVpv00NiNusifC7bKvsITb5PlKQKq1looQD0DPe0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=FAhxurLrfD35MYWNDv6HuPhYu7jhpf6rWunw3SV2Usk7UMnIBjWt9tGgPxjQ+jQ5s aCV/sjDs5F22JNvmuhLNz+Qvt/DPzNcyxzcaCAADK3k+A/HxRW4M/NWUaf3JhU+A4n YtTcOKcqqjzzWcFNZx/QMIsEIng/1M3n4nwyWWfKMygSKWkraogS159itvAhCeWZOo +WILPFks5BV5+ZW5Qwk+7KBoSa9cp60XpkwhVTOzowfC46zcfGLLL3W9jQn7UXRrwo 4fMnPQA0Di4RTmjZKdkkBFLrM2UemQmjQXLwTwnHzB85VDXe+lyK77nTevBflAaQI9 Tpq9YCjrlkyHg== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4Rd7FT2Pwrz9rxF; Sat, 2 Sep 2023 10:23:09 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:309857 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > > I don't think every Emacs user should be > > expected to be familiar with Git OR to > > know how to `M-x package-upgrade'. > > I agree. (I have only the most basic knowledge of how to use git, and > I have no idea how to use package-upgrade. And I can't afford to > spend time learning more. In the abstract, I'd be glad to know -- but > I am overloaded already!) I think that this discussion got completely disconnected from the starting point. In the above replies, I was advocating that updating from ELPA is __easier__ compared to updating from Git and Emacs users are more likely to know how to update from ELPA and less likely to known how to update from Git: >> >> Is there any downside holding on a minor release if _some_ bugs are >> >> already fixed, even if others are not yet? >> > >> > What would be the point? People who want something like that can >> > simply build the Git release branch, where we fix bugs every few days. >> >> For Org, a number of people just update from ELPA. Releasing benefits >> these users. > I don't see how is that different from updating from Git. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at