From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Add completion to compilation-read-command Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2024 09:27:53 +0200 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <87h66s5jg6.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <87ttatb9g0.fsf@posteo.net> <87a5clm3p5.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87o710j4pf.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <877c7oaeuz.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40918"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/31.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: Spyros Roum , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 25 08:37:48 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tQLxk-000AZU-K8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2024 08:37:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tQLwu-0002hj-Nv; Wed, 25 Dec 2024 02:36:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tQLws-0002h0-Cv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2024 02:36:54 -0500 Original-Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:dc4:8::226]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tQLwq-0008BY-EN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2024 02:36:54 -0500 Original-Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A3A3C0003; Wed, 25 Dec 2024 07:36:40 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <877c7oaeuz.fsf@posteo.net> (Philip Kaludercic's message of "Tue, 24 Dec 2024 22:35:48 +0000") X-GND-Sasl: juri@linkov.net Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:4b98:dc4:8::226; envelope-from=juri@linkov.net; helo=relay6-d.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:327056 Archived-At: > I don't see a harm in having an additional user option. Maybe with the name 'compilation-read-command-function'? >>> You can use 'C-x ' in the compile prompt to complete on past commands. >> >> Why the heck is this useful command completely undocumented?? > > I second this confusion, and want to mention that the binding is not > that convenient + might be shadowed for windmove users. Agreed, the current keybinding is not great. This is why it was undocumented. Probably a better key sequence should end with the TAB key since it's a completion command.