From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: {Spam?} Re: Window/buffer management in gdb-ui Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 17:46:12 -0500 Message-ID: <87fz2wtejv.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> References: <16805.16406.567084.398496@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <87hdndapae.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <16806.29150.178158.7827@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <87d5y1gsmk.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <16807.20864.538433.624364@farnswood.snap.net.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1101509252 23447 80.91.229.6 (26 Nov 2004 22:47:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 22:47:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 26 23:47:25 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CXos8-0007tc-00 for ; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 23:47:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CXp1P-0006ha-3w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 17:56:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CXp0k-0006U4-Mn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 17:56:18 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CXp0e-0006R7-0t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 17:56:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CXp0d-0006PO-Hx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 17:56:11 -0500 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.54] (helo=tomts10-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CXoqz-0003nK-Pd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 17:46:13 -0500 Original-Received: from alfajor ([67.68.216.58]) by tomts10-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP id <20041126224613.JTDL1863.tomts10-srv.bellnexxia.net@alfajor>; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 17:46:13 -0500 Original-Received: by alfajor (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EE82B2FD52; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 17:46:12 -0500 (EST) Original-To: Nick Roberts In-Reply-To: <16807.20864.538433.624364@farnswood.snap.net.nz> (Nick Roberts's message of "Sat, 27 Nov 2004 04:53:36 +1300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:30415 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:30415 >> Well, I know what it does. My question had to do with the end goal: >> "protect the contents of a window" is not very clear. Which scenario are >> you trying to avoid? > I'm thinking of two modes of operation. Firstly the gdb buffers in > separate frame which I think was working OK. Secondly the gdb buffers in > one frame (either using gdb-many windows or invoking the commands > gdb-display-breakpoints etc separately) which was not so good. That doesn't tell me the scenario(s) you're trying to avoid. Stefan