From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MAINTAINERS file Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 09:10:07 +0900 Message-ID: <87fxv3pf6o.fsf@catnip.gol.com> References: <18375.18663.981150.252393@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <87od9wt19m.fsf@elegiac.orebokech.com> <87tzjnvjhc.fsf@red-bean.com> <87ablffdf7.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <4s4pbm9lrb.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87skz4n6lu.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87r6enpy30.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <47D050B0.1060608@emf.net> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204848651 27361 80.91.229.12 (7 Mar 2008 00:10:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 00:10:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Glenn Morris , rms@gnu.org, lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, kfogel@red-bean.com, Stefan Monnier , paul.r.ml@gmail.com To: Thomas Lord Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 07 01:11:16 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JXQB2-0006Ti-9j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 01:11:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JXQAU-0005wE-Ey for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:10:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JXQAP-0005vn-Ka for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:10:29 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JXQAO-0005vL-5s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:10:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JXQAO-0005vI-2D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:10:28 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp11.dentaku.gol.com ([203.216.5.73]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JXQAD-0007A5-JF; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:10:18 -0500 Original-Received: from 203-216-102-071.dsl.gol.ne.jp ([203.216.102.71] helo=catnip.gol.com) by smtp11.dentaku.gol.com with esmtpa (Dentaku) id 1JXQA5-0006Sz-FB; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 09:10:11 +0900 Original-Received: by catnip.gol.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3AC482FF7; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 09:10:07 +0900 (JST) System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: <47D050B0.1060608@emf.net> (Thomas Lord's message of "Thu, 06 Mar 2008 12:14:40 -0800") Original-Lines: 18 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV GOL (outbound) X-Abuse-Complaints: abuse@gol.com X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:91569 Archived-At: Thomas Lord writes: > Arch is "heavier" than other systems and, in some ways, is basically > "doing more" (than, e.g., git) so, yes, it won't win prizes for commit > times any soon. Geez, don't be silly Tom. The problem is that the arch implementation plays bugger-all attention to efficiency, whereas git has had many people rabidly obsessing over every possible aspect of efficiency for years... Nothing to do with functionality. -Miles -- "Nah, there's no bigger atheist than me. Well, I take that back. I'm a cancer screening away from going agnostic and a biopsy away from full-fledged Christian." [Adam Carolla]