From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Yoni Rabkin Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: TODO item: obsolete bug-reporting commands Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 12:22:20 +0200 Message-ID: <87fxv1zfab.fsf@rabkins.net> References: <87y7962obp.fsf@rabkins.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204971835 8560 80.91.229.12 (8 Mar 2008 10:23:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 10:23:55 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 08 11:24:21 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JXwE0-00049H-S2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 11:24:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JXwDS-0006NH-Se for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 05:23:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JXwDJ-0006LM-7f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 05:23:37 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JXwDD-0006CA-Uy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 05:23:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JXwDD-0006BY-Cv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 05:23:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mailgw.comm.net.il ([193.238.208.251]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JXwDC-0005GK-AP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 05:23:31 -0500 Original-Received: from rabkins.net (rabkins.net [193.238.208.83]) by mailgw.comm.net.il (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id m289DA34023239 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2008 11:13:10 +0200 Original-Received: from ardbeg.rabkins.net [62.56.252.45] by rabkins.net with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.15) id A99E58E0146; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 12:25:34 +0200 X-Ethics: Use GNU In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:04:37 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:91710 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: [snip] > Indeed, we may want to revisit this in the future, but in any case, it's > useful to redirect report to the normal Emacs address if the claimed > maintainer is not the maintainer any more: for those problems, we don't > have any reason to wait. Should I send out emails to the package maintainers in question and ask them? I'm asking because I wound not send such email on behalf of the Emacs developers without the explicit permission of this list. Based on the answers (or lack thereof), I could then prepare a patch-set which changes the appropriate addresses in their corresponding packages. -- "Cut your own wood and it will warm you twice"