Re: Maintenance suggestion on an emacs mode

[Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>]

Ralf Angeli <angeli@caeruleus.net> writes:

> Please don't change those.  There are already bindings for them (except
> for the last two) in place.  Setting `reftex-extra-bindings' really is
> only there to spare users the hassle of defining bindings in the user
> space themselves.

Could you add a comment to reftex.el saying that we are aware of the
violation of the "no C-c [letter] binding" rule, with the explanation
you gave above?


Paul R <paul.r.ml@gmail.com> writes:

>> Please don't change those.  There are already bindings for them (except
>> for the last two) in place.  Setting `reftex-extra-bindings' really is
>> only there to spare users the hassle of defining bindings in the user
>> space themselves.
>
> I have no particular position on that. It is in a move to clean up
> sources from C-c[a-Z] bindings.
> As far as this particular modification is concerned, I think it is
> acceptable because ...

With the above change, we can leave these alone.  Thanks.