From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#893: incorrect font chosen Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 16:26:47 -0400 Message-ID: <87fxnkxbi0.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> Reply-To: Chong Yidong , 893@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1222635026 20313 80.91.229.12 (28 Sep 2008 20:50:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 20:50:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 893@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 28 22:51:24 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Kk3Ee-0008Hw-7V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 22:51:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59836 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kk3Da-00040q-Pz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 16:50:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kk3DW-0003zm-Co for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 16:50:10 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kk3DU-0003z8-1P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 16:50:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=32999 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kk3DT-0003z5-SH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 16:50:07 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:32898) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Kk3DS-0003PC-Kh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 16:50:07 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m8SKntmt005004; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 13:49:55 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m8SKZ3A7001469; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 13:35:03 -0700 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Chong Yidong Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 20:35:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 893 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 893-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B893.122263356132591 (code B ref 893); Sun, 28 Sep 2008 20:35:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 893) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 28 Sep 2008 20:26:01 +0000 Original-Received: from cyd.mit.edu (CYD.MIT.EDU [18.115.2.24]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m8SKPwRm032585 for <893@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 13:25:59 -0700 Original-Received: by cyd.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 57EE557E33A; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 16:26:47 -0400 (EDT) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 16:50:09 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:20858 Archived-At: > xrdb /dev/null > > emacs -Q -xrm 'emacs.Font: > -b&h-lucidatypewriter-medium-r-normal-sans-12-120-75-75-m-70-iso10646-1' > > uses the lucidatypewriter font for the default face, but doing: > > emacs -Q -xrm 'Emacs.Font: > -b&h-lucidatypewriter-medium-r-normal-sans-12-120-75-75-m-70-iso10646-1' > > uses: > > x:-adobe-courier-medium-r-normal--12-120-75-75-m-70-iso8859-1 (#x20) I can't reproduce this problem either. Do you still see it? If so, any luck debugging?