From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Giorgos Keramidas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Moving to bzr? Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:58:37 +0200 Message-ID: <87fxjnc9sy.fsf@kobe.laptop> References: <871vviif6s.fsf@xemacs.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1231873174 11812 80.91.229.12 (13 Jan 2009 18:59:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:59:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Stephen J. Turnbull" , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 13 20:00:46 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LMoV6-0008DY-9u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:00:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58664 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LMoTn-0004Y8-2O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:59:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LMoTc-0004Q9-IY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:59:00 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LMoTX-0004KJ-Fx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:58:59 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46422 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LMoTX-0004Js-6n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:58:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mx-out.forthnet.gr ([193.92.150.104]:16262) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LMoTS-0005CH-D4; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:58:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mx-av-05.forthnet.gr (mx-av.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.27]) by mx-out-04.forthnet.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n0DIwivx022318; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:58:44 +0200 Original-Received: from MX-IN-04.forthnet.gr (mx-in-04.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.163]) by mx-av-05.forthnet.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n0DIwiP1008294; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:58:44 +0200 Original-Received: from kobe.laptop (adsl40-151.kln.forthnet.gr [77.49.167.151]) by MX-IN-04.forthnet.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n0DIwfZR004697; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:58:42 +0200 Authentication-Results: MX-IN-04.forthnet.gr smtp.mail=keramida@ceid.upatras.gr; spf=neutral Authentication-Results: MX-IN-04.forthnet.gr header.from=keramida@ceid.upatras.gr; sender-id=neutral Original-Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n0DIwe6u088159; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:58:40 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Original-Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n0DIwbjw087988; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:58:37 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 05 Jan 2009 06:20:31 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:107829 Archived-At: On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 06:20:31 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> > I am updating bzr from their development branch and hence have the >> > latest and greatest. When I run a 'bzr pull' on Emacs repo daily, it >> > is running for >15 mins versus less than 3 mins for git. This is a > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > "Less than 3 mins" is too slow, if what I've heard about git is > correct. Maybe the OP was testing that on Windows. It probably is. I just run 10 pulls from the remote Git repository with less than 2 seconds of time for the pulls that are basically NOPs: $ for count in $(jot 10 1 10) ; do \ /usr/bin/time git fetch 2>&1 > /dev/null ; \ done | nl 1 6.22 real 0.02 user 0.05 sys 2 1.43 real 0.01 user 0.04 sys 3 1.71 real 0.01 user 0.04 sys 4 1.54 real 0.01 user 0.04 sys 5 1.65 real 0.00 user 0.04 sys 6 1.55 real 0.00 user 0.04 sys 7 1.67 real 0.00 user 0.05 sys 8 1.57 real 0.01 user 0.03 sys 9 1.59 real 0.00 user 0.05 sys 10 1.51 real 0.00 user 0.05 sys That's more typical of the speed of Git for remote operations.