From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Please try Pmail
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:07:48 -0500
Message-ID: <87fxjcv04b.fsf@cyd.mit.edu>
References: <873afdti10.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <E1LPjk1-0002P2-CQ@fencepost.gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1232572211 5693 80.91.229.12 (21 Jan 2009 21:10:11 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:10:11 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: rms@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 21 22:11:24 2009
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1LPkJh-00056g-8O
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:08:53 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50887 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LPkIP-00078U-N6
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:07:33 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LPkIK-00076D-IY
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:07:28 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LPkII-00075A-T1
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:07:28 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57653 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LPkII-000757-P3
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:07:26 -0500
Original-Received: from cyd.mit.edu ([18.115.2.24]:48592)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <cyd@stupidchicken.com>)
	id 1LPkIG-0004NY-Ez; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:07:24 -0500
Original-Received: by cyd.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id EE5CB57E225; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:07:48 -0500 (EST)
In-Reply-To: <E1LPjk1-0002P2-CQ@fencepost.gnu.org> (Richard M. Stallman's
	message of "Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:32:01 -0500")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux)
X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not
	recognized.
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108050
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/108050>

Richard M Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:

>     The annotation functions would need to add functions to that hook
>     when they are run.  Maybe this is a good solution, but I'm not
>     sure.
>
> I think it would be simpler to implement buffer-swapped-with.

We have to fix the write-region-annotate-functions problem anyway (i.e.,
that swapping buffers more than once currently does the wrong thing).