From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Tobias C. Rittweiler" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is this fallout from the end-of-defun changes? Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 21:53:55 +0100 Message-ID: <87fxhus4yk.fsf@freebits.de> References: <87vdqvedpd.fsf@freebits.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1236113674 11369 80.91.229.12 (3 Mar 2009 20:54:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 20:54:34 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 03 21:55:51 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LebeN-0007Nc-91 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 21:55:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38276 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lebd2-0004vI-9E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:54:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lebcv-0004ul-RY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:54:09 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lebcv-0004uM-51 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:54:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45203 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lebcu-0004uJ-TM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:54:08 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:34999 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lebcu-0005gE-EB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:54:08 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Lebcq-0004he-Bo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 20:54:04 +0000 Original-Received: from host145.natpool.mwn.de ([138.246.7.145]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 20:54:04 +0000 Original-Received: from tcr by host145.natpool.mwn.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 20:54:04 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 30 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host145.natpool.mwn.de User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:xvotMBDpCqEdIIf12aO3qx315JQ= X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:109422 Archived-At: "Tobias C. Rittweiler" writes: > Stefan Monnier writes: > > > > I'll file a bug report as soon as Stefan confirms that it is one (it > > > should, it's quite weird to be on a line of function1 and get > > > function2 evalled). > > > > Yes, it's a bug, of course. I believe I've fixed it, > > That does not seem to be fixed properly: > > 1 > > 2; point here, then C-M-x > > (defun foo () 42) > > This evaluates `foo'. > > GNU Emacs 23.0.91.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.12.9) of > 2009-02-27 on thaleron This does not seem to be fixed yet. Should I report this as an Emacs bug explicitly? It's a regression, and I'd like to see this fixed before the release. (I do use C-M-x on variable names.) Thanks! -T.