From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Differences between ibuffer and dired Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 23:57:28 +0300 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <87fx014k3z.fsf@mail.jurta.org> References: <871vbmnaxk.fsf@escher.home> <38165C775CE64A828DB8008B087373F7@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1278108889 26732 80.91.229.12 (2 Jul 2010 22:14:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 22:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stephen Berman , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Drew Adams , Deniz Dogan To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 03 00:14:47 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OUoVS-0001fv-P3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 00:14:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54090 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OUoVR-0003bQ-PH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 18:14:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42600 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OUoTM-0002Dm-3F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 18:12:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OUoTI-0002Xt-Kx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 18:12:36 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp-out2.starman.ee ([85.253.0.4]:41145 helo=mx2.starman.ee) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OUoTI-0002Xp-EV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 18:12:32 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavisd-New at mx2.starman.ee Original-Received: from mail.starman.ee (82.131.28.160.cable.starman.ee [82.131.28.160]) by mx2.starman.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C1CE3F4137; Sat, 3 Jul 2010 01:12:27 +0300 (EEST) In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Fri, 2 Jul 2010 01:27:57 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:126715 Archived-At: > While we are looking at this: Wasn't there a discussion before about > putting ibuffer on C-x C-b? I don't remember, someone had something to > say about this. Was it Juri? Do you mean this thread? http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/91359/focus=91388 -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/