From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Teemu Likonen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Locks on the Bzr repository Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 12:36:34 +0300 Message-ID: <87fwy7yonx.fsf@mithlond.arda> References: <4C6D56DB.7040703@swipnet.se> <4C6D8EC5.7040901@swipnet.se> <4C6E1F0A.7070506@swipnet.se> <837hjlr78p.fsf@gnu.org> <87zkwhtws5.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83tymppj62.fsf@gnu.org> <871v9t8klf.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83lj81pazq.fsf@gnu.org> <83aaogpcbu.fsf@gnu.org> <87vd737pxd.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83pqxboi38.fsf@gnu.org> <19568.59349.718000.978281@gargle.gargle.HOWL> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1282469852 13134 80.91.229.12 (22 Aug 2010 09:37:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 09:37:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Uday S. Reddy" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 22 11:37:30 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1On6zT-00076A-Du for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 11:37:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35897 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1On6zS-00069n-Cc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 05:37:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38363 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1On6zJ-00068p-9L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 05:37:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1On6zI-00043R-0u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 05:37:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mta-out.inet.fi ([195.156.147.13]:53600 helo=jenni1.inet.fi) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1On6zH-00042Q-Lr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 05:37:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mithlond.arda (84.251.132.215) by jenni1.inet.fi (8.5.122) id 4C5FB7C600799F37; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 12:36:55 +0300 Original-Received: from dtw by mithlond.arda with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1On6yg-0001yr-Gf; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 12:36:34 +0300 In-Reply-To: <19568.59349.718000.978281@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (Uday S. Reddy's message of "Sun, 22 Aug 2010 10:03:17 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:129020 Archived-At: * 2010-08-22 10:03 (+0100), Uday S. Reddy wrote: > If Bazaar is a "gnu project", can FSF lean on them to produce a proper > integrated rebase? Bazaar is a GNU project but more strongly and in practice it's a Canonical Ltd. project with a couple of paid developers (and few others). Obviously it's free software (as in the GPL v2) so anyone who cares about Bazaar can work on improving it. For code contribution there is some kind of policy for assigning copyrights to Canonical Ltd. but I don't know the details.