From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: gtk scroll bar: upstream bug report Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 09:59:55 +0200 Message-ID: <87fwmd2qo4.fsf@pobox.com> References: <4E19DD79.3030309@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310371234 9795 80.91.229.12 (11 Jul 2011 08:00:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 08:00:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jan =?utf-8?Q?Dj=C3=A4rv?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 11 10:00:30 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgBPq-0000te-3u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:00:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44298 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QgBPo-0000x6-NE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 04:00:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:56117) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QgBPS-0000uf-IT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 04:00:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QgBPQ-0007fo-ED for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 04:00:06 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:36216 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QgBPQ-0007eB-0w; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 04:00:04 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB9A2DAA; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 04:00:00 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=j1Jokyzp1gbI bCehK43rEqY+jxk=; b=k+L+8Lt84A90+QAvrjtRf9+2FM6WH62rucOzsZLiywmf sJMVCDB/PiLdQ2Pkw57ERY3ZGuWRcLwNYvO5IuBwbSCEF0TyduPXmnRDa1N95TSX gnnvxlQjxxKDOwciY7U8u8vO+H5ZfHNCYAEHZMotjyHFjOhGhE7alp/sxmpLhw4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=VqZuTx V8aFMBkSrCQJzcYktu/nKI+zhzLFlBn8wIZG/JJKkt+yzVIF4qGd2f11WThxpCkF 4X076Gxz+WyHUQw9PJLoe1RnuoPduYLWJU2/amdWSTERSaabuG9j8oWlDEEV7LH5 GGzLIQYHmaA7sMPK3lLqwk6+Ij/tqqXhswNwY= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 425322DA9; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 04:00:00 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8CD482DA8; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 03:59:59 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <4E19DD79.3030309@swipnet.se> ("Jan =?utf-8?Q?Dj=C3=A4rv=22's?= message of "Sun, 10 Jul 2011 19:12:25 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: C6570520-AB93-11E0-A042-5875C023C68D-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:141932 Archived-At: On Sun 10 Jul 2011 19:12, Jan Dj=C3=A4rv writes: > There never was any upstream bug report for this. The discussion > (starting here: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2003-03/msg00555.html) > made it clear that a bug report would not lead to anything. That was 8 years ago at this point. Might be worth another try. If you file a bug, and they still don't want to support this behavior, they could suggest a usable workaround. Just sayin'. Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/