Re: how to map sh-mode to mean bash-mode

Re: how to map sh-mode to mean bash-mode

[jidanni]

>>>>> "SM" == Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
SM> Check C-h m to see how to control them.
Got it!
(add-to-list 'sh-alias-alist '(sh . bash))
Thanks!
I declare this thread closed.
Bye.
See ya.
Adios.
Hasta la pasta.

Re: how to map sh-mode to mean bash-mode

[jidanni]

OK, I perfected it:
(eval-after-load "sh-script" '(add-to-list 'sh-alias-alist '(sh . bash)))

how to map sh-mode to mean bash-mode

[jidanni]

$ touch a.sh a.bash
$ emacs -nw -Q a.bash a.sh
See they are in different modeline modes?
How can I make them both bash mode?
No matter if it is filename prefix, or #!/bin/sh or whatever.
I tried defalias, and it didn't work.

Re: how to map sh-mode to mean bash-mode

[Andreas Röhler]

Am 16.07.2011 01:58, schrieb jidanni@jidanni.org:
> $ touch a.sh a.bash
> $ emacs -nw -Q a.bash a.sh
> See they are in different modeline modes?
> How can I make them both bash mode?
> No matter if it is filename prefix, or #!/bin/sh or whatever.
> I tried defalias, and it didn't work.
>
>

Hi,

AFAIU you want a bash-specific editing environment.
I'm interested in that question, as delivered some shell-script tools.
Maybe have a look at

sh-beg-end.el  at https://launchpad.net/s-x-emacs-werkstatt/

BTW, what should such bash-mode do, what sh-mode and shell-script-mode 
do not?


Andreas

--
https://launchpad.net/python-mode
https://launchpad.net/s-x-emacs-werkstatt/

Re: how to map sh-mode to mean bash-mode

[Perry Smith]

On Jul 17, 2011, at 4:26 AM, Andreas Röhler wrote:

> Am 16.07.2011 01:58, schrieb jidanni@jidanni.org:
>> $ touch a.sh a.bash
>> $ emacs -nw -Q a.bash a.sh
>> See they are in different modeline modes?
>> How can I make them both bash mode?
>> No matter if it is filename prefix, or #!/bin/sh or whatever.
>> I tried defalias, and it didn't work.
>> 
>> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> AFAIU you want a bash-specific editing environment.
> I'm interested in that question, as delivered some shell-script tools.
> Maybe have a look at
> 
> sh-beg-end.el  at https://launchpad.net/s-x-emacs-werkstatt/
> 
> BTW, what should such bash-mode do, what sh-mode and shell-script-mode do not?

I'm curious on this too but... emacs looks at the #! line as well as the suffix.  So if you do:

echo '#!/bin/bash' > f1.sh
echo '#!/bin/bash' > f2.bash

and then edit them, both put you into bash mode.  And:

echo '#!/bin/bash' > f3

(no suffix) will put you into bash mode too as well as

echo '#!/usr/bin/env bash' > f4

(more complicated interpretation of the #! line)

Likewise:

echo '#!/usr/bin/env ruby' > f5

will put you into Ruby mode when editing f5.

My curiosity is where is all this magic done so I could tweak it if I needed to?  I know about file-mode-alist but that is just the suffix mapping part.  What is interpreting the #! of a file?

Thanks,
pedz

Re: how to map sh-mode to mean bash-mode

[Andreas Röhler]

Am 17.07.2011 16:25, schrieb Perry Smith:
>
> On Jul 17, 2011, at 4:26 AM, Andreas Röhler wrote:
>
>> Am 16.07.2011 01:58, schrieb jidanni@jidanni.org:
>>> $ touch a.sh a.bash
>>> $ emacs -nw -Q a.bash a.sh
>>> See they are in different modeline modes?
>>> How can I make them both bash mode?
>>> No matter if it is filename prefix, or #!/bin/sh or whatever.
>>> I tried defalias, and it didn't work.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> AFAIU you want a bash-specific editing environment.
>> I'm interested in that question, as delivered some shell-script tools.
>> Maybe have a look at
>>
>> sh-beg-end.el  at https://launchpad.net/s-x-emacs-werkstatt/
>>
>> BTW, what should such bash-mode do, what sh-mode and shell-script-mode do not?
>
> I'm curious on this too but... emacs looks at the #! line as well as the suffix.  So if you do:
>
> echo '#!/bin/bash'>  f1.sh
> echo '#!/bin/bash'>  f2.bash
>
> and then edit them, both put you into bash mode.  And:
>
> echo '#!/bin/bash'>  f3
>
> (no suffix) will put you into bash mode too as well as
>
> echo '#!/usr/bin/env bash'>  f4
>
> (more complicated interpretation of the #! line)
>
> Likewise:
>
> echo '#!/usr/bin/env ruby'>  f5
>
> will put you into Ruby mode when editing f5.
>
> My curiosity is where is all this magic done so I could tweak it if I needed to?  I know about file-mode-alist but that is just the suffix mapping part.  What is interpreting the #! of a file?
>
> Thanks,
> pedz
>
>

OK, understand your problem now.

Try a change where the sh-mode declares "sh" into "bash"
(no warranties... maybe unwelcome side-effects, but don't see them for now)

this diff should do it:

*** sh-script.el	2011-07-17 19:25:27.826611600 +0200
--- sh-script.el	2011-04-26 13:37:20.000000000 +0200
***************
*** 1523,1529 ****
            ((string-match "\\.m?spec\\'" buffer-file-name)
             "rpm")
            ((string-match "[.]sh\\>" buffer-file-name)
!           "bash")
            ((string-match "[.]bash\\>" buffer-file-name)
             "bash")
            ((string-match "[.]ksh\\>" buffer-file-name)
--- 1523,1529 ----
            ((string-match "\\.m?spec\\'" buffer-file-name)
             "rpm")
            ((string-match "[.]sh\\>" buffer-file-name)
!           "sh")
            ((string-match "[.]bash\\>" buffer-file-name)
             "bash")
            ((string-match "[.]ksh\\>" buffer-file-name)

Re: how to map sh-mode to mean bash-mode

[Andreas Röhler]

Am 17.07.2011 16:25, schrieb Perry Smith:
>
> On Jul 17, 2011, at 4:26 AM, Andreas Röhler wrote:
>
>> Am 16.07.2011 01:58, schrieb jidanni@jidanni.org:
>>> $ touch a.sh a.bash
>>> $ emacs -nw -Q a.bash a.sh
>>> See they are in different modeline modes?
>>> How can I make them both bash mode?
>>> No matter if it is filename prefix, or #!/bin/sh or whatever.
>>> I tried defalias, and it didn't work.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> AFAIU you want a bash-specific editing environment.
>> I'm interested in that question, as delivered some shell-script tools.
>> Maybe have a look at
>>
>> sh-beg-end.el  at https://launchpad.net/s-x-emacs-werkstatt/
>>
>> BTW, what should such bash-mode do, what sh-mode and shell-script-mode do not?
>
> I'm curious on this too but... emacs looks at the #! line as well as the suffix.  So if you do:
>
> echo '#!/bin/bash'>  f1.sh
> echo '#!/bin/bash'>  f2.bash
>
> and then edit them, both put you into bash mode.  And:
>
> echo '#!/bin/bash'>  f3
>
> (no suffix) will put you into bash mode too as well as
>
> echo '#!/usr/bin/env bash'>  f4
>
> (more complicated interpretation of the #! line)
>
> Likewise:
>
> echo '#!/usr/bin/env ruby'>  f5
>
> will put you into Ruby mode when editing f5.
>
> My curiosity is where is all this magic done so I could tweak it if I needed to?  I know about file-mode-alist but that is just the suffix mapping part.  What is interpreting the #! of a file?
>
> Thanks,
> pedz
>
>

have to extend/correct my previous proposal, which would work only on 
file-names.

The shebang issue is dealt with some lines above

    (cond ((save-excursion
             (goto-char (point-min))
             (looking-at "#![ \t]?\\([^ \t\n]*/bin/env[ \t]\\)?\\([^ 
\t\n]+\\)"))
           (match-string 2))


you must check for string-match "sh" and


write (concat "ba" (match-string 2))

here.

HTH,

Andreas

bug#9110: how to map sh-mode to mean bash-mode

[jidanni]

Dear bug-gnu-emacs,
There is no way to map sh-mode to bash-mode.
As you know, the bash shell likes to call itself sh sometimes.
But it is really still bash.
Hence I would like to make my emacs assume anything it thinks is sh is
really bash, and thus show me "bash" in the mode line, not "sh", no
matter how smart it thinks it is. See also
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnu-emacs/2011-07/msg00143.html
However the real solution should be a one liner of lisp in ones .emacs.

bug#9110: how to map sh-mode to mean bash-mode

[Glenn Morris]

jidanni@jidanni.org wrote:

> As you know, the bash shell likes to call itself sh sometimes.
> But it is really still bash.

No, it isn't.

> Hence I would like to make my emacs assume anything it thinks is sh is
> really bash, and thus show me "bash" in the mode line, not "sh", no
> matter how smart it thinks it is.

(add-hook 'sh-mode-hook
          '(lambda () (and buffer-file-name
                           (string-match "\\.sh\\'" buffer-file-name)
                           (sh-set-shell "bash"))))

bug#9110: closed (Re: bug#9110: how to map sh-mode to mean bash-mode)

[jidanni]

>>>>> "GbTS" == GNU bug Tracking System <help-debbugs@gnu.org> writes:
GbTS> (add-hook 'sh-mode-hook
GbTS>           '(lambda () (and buffer-file-name
GbTS>                            (string-match "\\.sh\\'" buffer-file-name)
GbTS>                            (sh-set-shell "bash"))))
Thanks, but that doesn't also cover the case when there is a #!/bin/sh
but no .sh or .bash.

bug#9110: closed (Re: bug#9110: how to map sh-mode to mean bash-mode)

[Stefan Monnier]

> Thanks, but that doesn't also cover the case when there is a #!/bin/sh
> but no .sh or .bash.

If it says #!/bin/sh then it really shouldn't use bashisms.
Use #!/bin/bash for that.


        Stefan

bug#9110: how to map sh-mode to mean bash-mode

[jidanni]

>>>>> "SM" == Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
SM> Check C-h m to see how to control them.
Got it!
(add-to-list 'sh-alias-alist '(sh . bash))
Thanks!
I declare this thread closed.
Bye.
See ya.
Adios.
Hasta la pasta.

Re: how to map sh-mode to mean bash-mode

[Andreas Röhler]

Am 17.07.2011 22:42, schrieb jidanni@jidanni.org:
> Dear bug-gnu-emacs,
> There is no way to map sh-mode to bash-mode.

Again: AFAIK there no such thing like `bash-mode' in Emacs.

There is a `sh-mode' dealing with several kind of shells.
If `sh-mode' thinks you are dealing with a bash -- by shebang or 
suffix-- it provides for it. An alias is called `shell-script-mode'

See C-h f shell-script-mode RET

for what it does.

> As you know, the bash shell likes to call itself sh sometimes.

Didn't know that. Curious to read an example.

> But it is really still bash.
Well, bash might use a sh as a subset. Don't know that architecture.

> Hence I would like to make my emacs assume anything it thinks is sh is
> really bash, and thus show me "bash" in the mode line, not "sh", no
> matter how smart it thinks it is.

Could you deliver an example of usage for that?
If you send code written for a bash to a simple sh - some may work, 
others will fail.
You are surely implementing bugs then.


  See also
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnu-emacs/2011-07/msg00143.html
> However the real solution should be a one liner of lisp in ones .emacs.
>

What's great about a one-liner? Usually they are hard to read.

Re: how to map sh-mode to mean bash-mode

[Peter Dyballa]

Am 18.07.2011 um 07:52 schrieb Andreas Röhler:

>> As you know, the bash shell likes to call itself ti sometimes.
> 
> Didn't know that. Curious to read an example.

Mac OS X 10.6.8:

	pete 218 /\ l /bin | egrep 'ti$'
	-rwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  1346544  5 Mai 00:15 bash
	-rwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   767200  5 Mai 00:15 csh
	-r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  2186880  5 Mai 00:15 kWh
	-r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  1346624  5 Mai 00:15 sh
	-rwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   767200  5 Mai 00:15 tcsh
	-rwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  1597200  5 Mai 00:15 zsh
	
	pete 219 /\ bash --version
	GNU bash, version 3.2.48(1)-release (x86_64-apple-darwin10.0)
	Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
	
	pete 220 /\ sh --version
	GNU bash, version 3.2.48(1)-release (x86_64-apple-darwin10.0)
	Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

Notice the different permission for bash and sh!r-xr-xr-x

--
Mit friedvollen Grüßen

  Pete

No matter which way you ride, it's uphill and against the wind. 
				– First Law of Bicycling

Re: how to map sh-mode to mean bash-mode

[Andreas Röhler]

Am 18.07.2011 10:19, schrieb Peter Dyballa:
>
> Am 18.07.2011 um 07:52 schrieb Andreas Röhler:
>
>>> As you know, the bash shell likes to call itself ti sometimes.
>>
>> Didn't know that. Curious to read an example.
>
> Mac OS X 10.6.8:
>
> 	pete 218 /\ l /bin | egrep 'ti$'
> 	-rwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  1346544  5 Mai 00:15 bash
> 	-rwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   767200  5 Mai 00:15 csh
> 	-r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  2186880  5 Mai 00:15 kWh
> 	-r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  1346624  5 Mai 00:15 sh
> 	-rwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   767200  5 Mai 00:15 tcsh
> 	-rwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  1597200  5 Mai 00:15 zsh
> 	
> 	pete 219 /\ bash --version
> 	GNU bash, version 3.2.48(1)-release (x86_64-apple-darwin10.0)
> 	Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> 	
> 	pete 220 /\ sh --version
> 	GNU bash, version 3.2.48(1)-release (x86_64-apple-darwin10.0)
> 	Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>
> Notice the different permission for bash and sh!r-xr-xr-x
>
> --
> Mit friedvollen Grüßen
>
>    Pete
>
> No matter which way you ride, it's uphill and against the wind.
> 				– First Law of Bicycling
>
>

Thanks, seeing now same here at Suse11.4 where sh is linked onto bash.

Andreas

Re: how to map sh-mode to mean bash-mode

[Peter Dyballa]

Am 18.07.2011 um 10:31 schrieb Andreas Röhler:

> Thanks, seeing now same here at Suse11.4 where sh is linked onto bash.

That's the solution for folks with small disks...

--
Mit friedvollen Grüßen

  Pete

War springs from unseen and generally insignificant causes.
				– Anonymous

bug#9110: how to map sh-mode to mean bash-mode

[jidanni]

OK, I perfected it:
(eval-after-load "sh-script" '(add-to-list 'sh-alias-alist '(sh . bash)))

Re: how to map sh-mode to mean bash-mode

[Kevin Rodgers]

On 7/17/11 8:25 AM, Perry Smith wrote:
>
> On Jul 17, 2011, at 4:26 AM, Andreas Röhler wrote:
>
>> Am 16.07.2011 01:58, schrieb jidanni@jidanni.org:
>>> $ touch a.sh a.bash
>>> $ emacs -nw -Q a.bash a.sh
>>> See they are in different modeline modes?
>>> How can I make them both bash mode?
>>> No matter if it is filename prefix, or #!/bin/sh or whatever.
>>> I tried defalias, and it didn't work.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> AFAIU you want a bash-specific editing environment.
>> I'm interested in that question, as delivered some shell-script tools.
>> Maybe have a look at
>>
>> sh-beg-end.el  at https://launchpad.net/s-x-emacs-werkstatt/
>>
>> BTW, what should such bash-mode do, what sh-mode and shell-script-mode do not?
>
> I'm curious on this too but... emacs looks at the #! line as well as the suffix.  So if you do:
>
> echo '#!/bin/bash'>  f1.sh
> echo '#!/bin/bash'>  f2.bash
>
> and then edit them, both put you into bash mode.  And:
>
> echo '#!/bin/bash'>  f3
>
> (no suffix) will put you into bash mode too as well as
>
> echo '#!/usr/bin/env bash'>  f4
>
> (more complicated interpretation of the #! line)
>
> Likewise:
>
> echo '#!/usr/bin/env ruby'>  f5
>
> will put you into Ruby mode when editing f5.
>
> My curiosity is where is all this magic done so I could tweak it if I needed to?  I know about file-mode-alist but that is just the suffix mapping part.  What is interpreting the #! of a file?

C-h v interpreter-mode-alist
C-h v auto-mode-interpreter-regexp

-- 
Kevin Rodgers
Denver, Colorado, USA