From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Nebulous streaming/point bug Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 18:12:05 -0400 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87fwieaxu2.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87sjmxt5ho.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1319753724 19808 80.91.229.12 (27 Oct 2011 22:15:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:15:24 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 28 00:15:20 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RJYEK-00054S-4X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 00:15:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51615 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJYEI-0003kM-SC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 18:15:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35268) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJYEC-0003k2-BZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 18:15:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJYE7-0005qD-DC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 18:15:12 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:53383) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJYE7-0005ow-2A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 18:15:07 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RJYE5-0004yj-Vz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 00:15:05 +0200 Original-Received: from c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net ([76.28.40.19]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 00:15:05 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 00:15:05 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 26 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:VQTbftXb8XKO4rRH1xZqkFQnecQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:145685 Archived-At: On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 07:56:19 -0500 Ted Zlatanov wrote: TZ> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 03:04:53 +0200 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: LMI> Yup. Looks like the problem was where I thought it would be. LMI> Now, I obviously don't recommend the horror included below as a patch, LMI> but it seems to make it possible to read news with Gnus again under LMI> Emacs 24. But it should be fixed in a different way. :-) LMI> I'm not familiar enough with GnuTLS internals to say what the fix really LMI> should be, but I can test patches. TZ> Based on your patch I think it's a GnuTLS bug. They are up to 3.x now, TZ> which makes it harder: do we keep supporting the 2.x series or do we TZ> start using 3.x, which will be harder to obtain because it's new, TZ> especially for the W32 build? I'd rather not support both and just move TZ> to 3.x, which has a fairly compatible API, and see if the bug is still TZ> there. What do you think? TZ> Obviously all this would happen after the release; for now I think it's TZ> best to use your patch and note it's temporary. Ping? I plan to dive into gnutls.{c,el} and need some feedback on 2.x vs. 3.x. Can we get 3.x built for W32 like 2.x? Thanks Ted