From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10721: 24.0.93; M-TAB for :type (file :must-match t) in Customize Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 17:26:58 +0800 Message-ID: <87fwdgn6vx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4CD96BA787BC4019878BF9804BA5BED7@us.oracle.com> <3094FAF0D1184F7F97D964B8316BEC35@us.oracle.com> <87ty33xk73.fsf@gnu.org> <129DB02C013E4F3B9B4FF20BFF3D684E@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1331371654 23660 80.91.229.3 (10 Mar 2012 09:27:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 09:27:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10721@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 10 10:27:33 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S6IaI-0005L7-Cv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 10:27:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36601 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S6IaH-000340-5z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 04:27:29 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59066) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S6IaE-00033j-98 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 04:27:27 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S6IaC-0000Zj-DN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 04:27:25 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35112) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S6IaC-0000Ze-AS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 04:27:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S6J2s-0008IC-6w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 04:57:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 09:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10721 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10721-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10721.133137341831861 (code B ref 10721); Sat, 10 Mar 2012 09:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10721) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Mar 2012 09:56:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41943 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S6J2o-0008Hq-2w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 04:56:58 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:48130) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S6J2c-0008HH-Le for 10721@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 04:56:56 -0500 Original-Received: from bb116-14-103-36.singnet.com.sg ([116.14.103.36]:55751 helo=ulysses) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S6IZu-0005C9-2T; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 04:27:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: <129DB02C013E4F3B9B4FF20BFF3D684E@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Tue, 7 Feb 2012 08:44:05 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:57632 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: >> But if the recipe involves face names, the bug title is >> misleading. It appears that general inline completion in >> fields is broken > >> nothing to do with (file :must-match t) types. > > Correct - it seems that all such completion fields are broken So it looks like this was Bug#6830, which Stefan fixed. Closing.