From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr [was: Next pretest, and regressions policy] Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 09:19:41 +0200 Message-ID: <87fwci4pde.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87k42cwys8.fsf@gnu.org> <87limhuldm.fsf@gnu.org> <871uo7g4j6.fsf@gnu.org> <87iphjhbm8.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87398lgrat.fsf_-_@niu.edu> <871uo5c7r0.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87pqbpj5j3.fsf@altern.org> <87wr5vz89v.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1333610358 623 80.91.229.3 (5 Apr 2012 07:19:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 07:19:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Thierry Volpiatto Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 05 09:19:17 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SFgyN-0001Rw-TU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 09:19:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48835 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFgyE-0000Jg-7p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 03:19:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50152) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFgy7-0000JY-1P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 03:19:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFgxw-0003lK-Vk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 03:18:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:46137) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFgxw-0003kv-M8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 03:18:44 -0400 Original-Received: by wgbdr1 with SMTP id dr1so747851wgb.30 for ; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 00:18:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=Dk/PUJ1ZyKzkR8/I1zdrg3djMks2rndzlgJ4RMCB9bA=; b=LbhV/O2dmuWSyqPCGJuWjwDipfeXBVb8gtSCdOzIQnbqNlvT4dNJsuKGC6k0wwXUzY nC3K7siM0H/nG34QA2coluLVgGJa5cGK0NHwTp3KX+s+LefTCo1thPelJdi/HTt9e/Hn tqnuLIkD1lTCh9UaDLTb/dUZG/C8AnuX6uW8Ri1O7o1SnHbT4N4Yrky7QgWyWz1mgDuz zkRQF9N1KvuWyUNRqQrb0qvbJ0oybdBRfDAKk8AobC3SiF2OoDm1uwl1cWi2WHNGxQcK RpsxdKJM2wEMAXDXIvGbLI0jXWD7KGfkSfdSRyVlSD7sJx2fLLHqZ5VNFtl5rP4Mp4sT HoZQ== Original-Received: by 10.180.96.228 with SMTP id dv4mr10243175wib.14.1333610306832; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 00:18:26 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from myhost.localdomain (pha75-11-82-236-86-204.fbx.proxad.net. [82.236.86.204]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ff9sm11366116wib.2.2012.04.05.00.18.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 05 Apr 2012 00:18:25 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by myhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7FD2C856E; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 09:19:41 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87wr5vz89v.fsf@gmail.com> (Thierry Volpiatto's message of "Wed, 04 Apr 2012 20:01:00 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 74.125.82.49 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:149394 Archived-At: Hi Thierry, Thierry Volpiatto writes: >> The problem is: how to create a patch from Org git repo that can be >> easily applied to Emacs bzr repo. > > Org git repo ==> convert to mercurial ==> clone to mercurial qpatch > make your changes here > and apply the resulting(s) > patche(s) to Emacs bzr repo. Please test this workflow *for real* and tell me if this is workable. Thanks, -- Bastien