From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GnuTLS docs Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 12:55:10 -0400 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87fwcclua9.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87d37q7ld4.fsf@gnu.org> <871uo6puac.fsf@gnu.org> <87y5qa72vm.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <834nsycjs0.fsf@gnu.org> <87y5qa5chf.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83pqblc2ih.fsf@gnu.org> <87pqbl6c9l.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83d37lb3nu.fsf@gnu.org> <87d37hofbs.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83k41p8ibl.fsf@gnu.org> <878vi5nlbg.fsf@lifelogs.com> <834nst848o.fsf@gnu.org> <87r4vxm4l2.fsf@lifelogs.com> <1rk41oubfu.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1333990825 17812 80.91.229.3 (9 Apr 2012 17:00:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 17:00:25 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 09 19:00:23 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SHHwz-0005YO-Cz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 19:00:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60660 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHHwy-0007yp-TF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 13:00:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54099) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHHws-0007yX-Da for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 13:00:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHHwm-0003Hg-LY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 13:00:13 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:51819) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHHwm-0003Gw-Db for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 13:00:08 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SHHwh-0005RE-JZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 19:00:03 +0200 Original-Received: from c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net ([76.28.40.19]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 19:00:03 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 19:00:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 19 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130004 (Ma Gnus v0.4) Emacs/24.0.95 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:g5W+zuhjXTyVAvVP/52FhACB/Q0= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:149525 Archived-At: On Mon, 09 Apr 2012 12:17:25 -0400 Glenn Morris wrote: GM> Ted Zlatanov wrote: >> Both fixed and it's pushed to trunk. It could safely go into 24.1. GM> Thanks for writing this. Surely there was no question that this should GM> go to the emacs-24 branch? I didn't want to assume it was OK and I'm not experienced at merging commits between Bazaar branches. If the answer is "yes" and "just do it" OK, but I'm being cautious with the release so close. GM> Also, it was recently noticed that $< is not portable in ordinary GM> make rules, so please replace all uses of that with its expansion. Sorry, I don't understand what you mean. Is there an example I should follow? I copied the auth.texi rules, assuming those were OK. Ted