From: Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>
To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] package.el: check tarball signature
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 17:14:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fvsgspq3.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 83pprkc02t.fsf@gnu.org
On Fri, 04 Oct 2013 22:23:06 +0300 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA>
>> Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 11:01:43 -0400
>>
>> > +(defcustom package-check-signature 'allow-unsigned
>> > + "Whether to check package signatures when installing."
>> > + :type '(choice (const nil :tag "Never")
>> > + (const allow-unsigned :tag "Allow unsigned")
>> > + (const t :tag "Check always"))
>> > + :risky t
>> > + :group 'package
>> > + :version "24.1")
>> > IMHO this should be per archive, not global. WDYT?
>>
>> Actually, let's wait. If all turn out well, most/all ELPA archives will
>> start providing signatures in the not too distant future and there'll be
>> no need for per-archive settings (and we can change the default to t).
EZ> Are you saying that verification will not need gpg be installed?
If my work with libnettle progresses well, I think we'll be able to at
least verify GPG signatures without calling out to GnuPG or other tools
on all the platforms that have libnettle+libhogweed (any platforms with
GnuTLS support AFAIK).
I can put up my current patch for review but I still have HMAC, maybe
UMAC, and RSA+DSA+ECC crypto to finish. The hashing methods and the
ciphers in ECB, CBC, and CTR modes are done with tests. Should I make a
Bazaar branch for that work? Is anyone interested in reviewing it?
Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-04 21:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-30 19:48 [PATCH] package.el: check tarball signature Daiki Ueno
2013-09-30 19:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-10-02 6:20 ` [PATCHv2] " Daiki Ueno
2013-10-02 10:43 ` Ted Zlatanov
2013-09-30 21:54 ` [PATCH] " Ted Zlatanov
2013-09-30 22:56 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-10-02 11:17 ` Ted Zlatanov
2013-10-02 7:16 ` Daiki Ueno
2013-10-02 10:41 ` Ted Zlatanov
2013-10-02 12:22 ` Daiki Ueno
2013-10-02 13:53 ` Ted Zlatanov
2013-10-03 3:51 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-10-02 13:15 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2013-10-03 3:45 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-10-03 3:52 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-10-03 7:18 ` Daiki Ueno
2013-10-03 14:19 ` Ted Zlatanov
2013-10-03 15:01 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-10-04 19:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-10-04 21:14 ` Ted Zlatanov [this message]
2013-10-05 0:34 ` Daiki Ueno
2013-10-05 5:40 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2013-10-05 10:03 ` Ted Zlatanov
2013-10-05 15:07 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2013-10-05 21:51 ` Ted Zlatanov
2013-10-05 9:57 ` Ted Zlatanov
2013-10-05 7:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-10-05 10:11 ` Ted Zlatanov
2013-10-05 12:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-10-05 13:53 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-10-04 2:46 ` Daiki Ueno
2013-10-04 16:19 ` Ted Zlatanov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87fvsgspq3.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com \
--to=tzz@lifelogs.com \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.