From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Berman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: electric-indent-mode (was Re: electric-pair-mode) Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 10:48:56 +0100 Message-ID: <87fvqsoh6f.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1384854579 17063 80.91.229.3 (19 Nov 2013 09:49:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 09:49:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 19 10:49:42 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VihwE-0003Wf-P3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 10:49:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48025 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VihwE-0001YF-Da for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 04:49:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35035) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vihve-0000z5-TA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 04:49:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VihvY-0008Uc-Q0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 04:49:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:55093) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VihvY-0008QS-Fb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 04:49:00 -0500 Original-Received: from rosalinde.fritz.box ([89.245.109.14]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M82zV-1VVQN62B2v-00vcY3 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 10:48:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sat, 16 Nov 2013 18:27:30 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:WWEG2i6VQk9fWAVsCwHuQwW/lUGNiiN37uivT4WiV0gH414iHcb JB9PuRJQhGIjbRttMV5ad9GVBeAUIBp8gyWzcNuB/YNQVCLfb4OnJItMwnHSTpkAeLqx1wk XFX0Kg7uEaex+cTD9illZy7WRwcUBSml/cIkpuYTKgq3G1ySYd7EC2qobk0VFd80afcxVaU oYRZdHiAKoXGjqbhaRE2Q== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.18 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:165365 Archived-At: On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 18:27:30 -0500 Stefan Monnier wrote: > AFAIK, most of the issues pointed out in the previous electric-pair-mode > have been resolved: > E.g. C-j and (newline) now insert a plain newline. Some indentation > functions are marked as "unable to reindent". > > I'm thinking of enabling electric-pair-mode in Emacs-24.4, and I think > the best way to do that is to actually enable it and then deal with the > complaints. But that only works if the complaints are > sufficiently constructive. > > So, please try enabling it and report any annoyance you notice. Will there be a new key binding for eval-print-last-sexp in *scratch*? Steve Berman