From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15382: desktop restores buffers in wrong order Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 21:58:09 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <87fvprw8q6.fsf@mail.jurta.org> References: <87y56ypiwv.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <874n69kdd6.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87vbyo4icw.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1387310417 7753 80.91.229.3 (17 Dec 2013 20:00:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 20:00:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15382@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 17 21:00:21 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vt0oU-0000u8-W1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 21:00:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35178 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vt0oU-0000oB-Ki for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 15:00:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48424) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vt0oM-0000nw-BN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 15:00:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vt0oG-0003xX-B1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 15:00:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42054) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vt0oG-0003vQ-8G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 15:00:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vt0oF-0004VB-AS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 15:00:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 20:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15382 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15382-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15382.138731037717242 (code B ref 15382); Tue, 17 Dec 2013 20:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15382) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2013 19:59:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56073 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vt0np-0004U2-AR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 14:59:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [69.163.184.122] (port=46780 helo=ps18281.dreamhostps.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vt0nn-0004Tr-EF for 15382@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 14:59:35 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost.jurta.org (ps18281.dreamhostps.com [69.163.184.122]) by ps18281.dreamhostps.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B35E736D0A78B8; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 11:59:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Tue, 17 Dec 2013 17:07:27 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:82144 Archived-At: > I do not see why do you think that it is intended only for the > multi-frame case. Restoring framesets is not intended just for > multi-frame setups, I use it all the time in my single-frame setup. I don't understand this condition: (unless (desktop-restoring-frameset-p) Why buffers should be restored in right order only when restoring a single-frame (without restoring a frameset) but not when restoring a single-frame from a frameset? I think restoring the original order is needed in both cases. > Correctly restoring the frames requires restoring the window-buffer > correspondence, so if you run the (mapc #'bury-buffer ...) code > afterwards, you destroy that correspondence. A way would be required > to reset buffer-list's without affecting how buffers are displayed... Maybe buffers should be saved in the desktop in reverse order? This will restore the original order of the global buffer list. And frame-local and window-local buffer lists needs to be saved too.