From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] eww-mode-map doesn't bind TAB on tty. Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 19:10:01 +0100 Message-ID: <87fvmwseiu.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: <87zjlbtnuw.fsf@fx.delysid.org> <87fvmx7nym.fsf@building.gnus.org> <83ppm1ralm.fsf@gnu.org> <83ob1lracq.fsf@gnu.org> <87d2i0zund.fsf@building.gnus.org> <87lhwor8m9.fsf@fx.delysid.org> <87k3c8sexr.fsf@building.gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1394043361 27228 80.91.229.3 (5 Mar 2014 18:16:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 18:16:01 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 05 19:16:10 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WLGMT-0006AU-Jo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 19:16:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53827 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WLGMT-0003lX-2F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 13:16:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53171) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WLGIn-00065Z-22 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 13:12:26 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WLGIg-0007bq-2u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 13:12:20 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:36497) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WLGIf-0007bg-Rq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 13:12:13 -0500 Original-Received: from 77.18.54.110.tmi.telenormobil.no ([77.18.54.110] helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WLGIO-0005sd-UH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 19:11:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87k3c8sexr.fsf@building.gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 05 Mar 2014 19:01:04 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1WLGIO-0005sd-UH MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1394647917.15758@4xKLXbKMR6UA1rYjslZLKw X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:170162 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Mario Lang writes: > >> And here is the result of grepping for the pattern in all Emacs Lisp files: > > Thanks; I'll replace all those (except the image-dired one)... Actually... before I do that... Some modes define both [?\M-\t] (or "\e\t"), which are the same thing, I think, as well as [backtab]. Same for [tab]. Like: (define-key map "\t" 'widget-forward) (define-key map "\e\t" 'widget-backward) (define-key map [(shift tab)] 'widget-backward) (put 'widget-backward :advertised-binding [(shift tab)]) (define-key map [backtab] 'widget-backward) Are there situations where just removing the latter binding is wrong? I.e., is there a difference between [?\M-\t] and [backtab] that should be preserved? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/