>>>>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>>>>> From: Ivan Shmakov  Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 09:10:54 +0000
>>>>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

[…]

 >>> There's nothing wrong with using "that" in these contexts,

 >> AIUI, there’s nothing wrong with using “which” there, either.

 > Indeed, there isn't.  But making such changes in a single document on
 > top of that, leaving all the other uses intact, hardly makes sense.
 > It could make sense if we agreed not to use "that" in these cases,
 > and then changed that all over and wrote somewhere in the docs that
 > this is our style.  But not in a single file.

	I’ve mostly dropped these changes, or (in three cases) reworded
	to avoid either.

 >>> replaces a recipe with an entirely different one.  Why not keep
 >>> both?

 >> The former recipe seems to predate the introduction of
 >> visible-cursor.  I see no reason to keep it now that there’s an easy
 >> way to solve the issue without having to modify terminfo or restart
 >> Emacs, etc.  I presume that the more experienced users will be able
 >> to gather all what necessary for a terminfo-based solution from the
 >> “use software cursor” recipe just above the one at hand.

 > I don't know enough about this to judge, so I will defer to others.
 > (I generally prefer to keep existing knowledge intact, even if it's
 > old, as long as it's correct; but that's me.)

	Done.

	Please consider the revised patch MIMEd.

-- 
FSF associate member #7257  np. A World Behind the World — Jami Sieber