From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jay Belanger Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Maintainers and contributors Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 19:37:17 -0500 Message-ID: <87fv127742.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87si59wj42.fsf@T420.taylan> <87h9llvo98.fsf@members.fsf.org> <5626622A.3090707@yandex.ru> <87zizdijbp.fsf@T420.taylan> <56267302.7050606@yandex.ru> <87io61igyu.fsf@T420.taylan> <56267CDF.6010201@yandex.ru> <87wpuhh15s.fsf@T420.taylan> <562683B9.1060305@yandex.ru> <83y4exe71v.fsf@gnu.org> <87fv13xirw.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <5628D0D2.4050507@yandex.ru> <87bnbrxewt.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83d1w7szw2.fsf@gnu.org> <5629341C.8050806@yandex.ru> Reply-To: jay.p.belanger@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1445560703 8226 80.91.229.3 (23 Oct 2015 00:38:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 00:38:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jay.p.belanger@gmail.com To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 23 02:38:18 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpQN5-0005Fw-3T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 02:38:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35176 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpQN4-0004Dz-7O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 20:38:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36172) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpQN1-0004Ds-1W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 20:38:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpQMx-00083Z-SI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 20:38:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ob0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c01::229]:34480) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpQMx-00083K-Nh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 20:38:07 -0400 Original-Received: by obbda8 with SMTP id da8so81218393obb.1 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:38:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:references:reply-to:cc:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=2IgFNnJJSWnzgZaaaHxg7QXC9vSaNRHTRYQ0WJx/mEI=; b=sEe9ieeMS1Q+YChtsMo/H3sEPF0/xAPFrHZrwHLNiwx69PjkWWApS43o8T414powCu rES+TmVx2XUnIL28kvfGGaxx24FGm1bCWvVJv1y8Et2GhVz32zKgjrVgnYEj2zNwOzud NOXy5GNVHA3yePAEYyxo16wk0sGzkTA86S0ByjoOgvAFWNPA14ZMqeiJO7xy/JXOx3t8 vrHR7WoraPovv9S9axz1dQQ6LvBAdvpoTmBkNgE9nEXgz6J7WdDoGCG+o/RM92ytf2lD Hstu8lrMtnhlvklD0RLO5ZSY/Q+u+IpSvyQVbOd5U7ThdWdLpKxDl7s2OPOs07wfnAQL qObA== X-Received: by 10.182.97.97 with SMTP id dz1mr12600271obb.17.1445560687270; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:38:07 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from belanger-home (67-60-185-108.cpe.cableone.net. [67.60.185.108]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k8sm7106003oia.10.2015.10.22.17.38.06 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:38:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (John Wiegley's message of "Thu, 22 Oct 2015 16:37:39 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c01::229 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:192441 Archived-At: John Wiegley writes: > My point is that we could have done a better job at addressing the > underlying concern, rather than the line that ended up being drawn in > the sand. Who drew a line in the sand? I didn't see any maintainers draw a line in the sand; on the contrary, Eli went well out of his way to be accommodating.