From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9432: 24.0.50; doc string of `next-error-highlight' Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 13:20:16 +0200 Message-ID: <87fuu6nfnz.fsf@gnus.org> References: <874o0rwf5p.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87pqjehurv.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87aaahsa0i.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <2BF83CABDAD949B19F7A752CDB1B43F3@us.oracle.com> <87ehzrj1qn.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87ehzqssmm.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1461842485 23135 80.91.229.3 (28 Apr 2016 11:21:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:21:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9432@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 28 13:21:14 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1avk0P-0008FS-MN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 13:21:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48024 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avk0O-00082y-9W for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 07:21:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55874) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avk0J-0007zB-FE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 07:21:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avk0E-0002nm-Kc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 07:21:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39018) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avk0E-0002ni-Gn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 07:21:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1avk0E-0007g3-AY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 07:21:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:21:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9432 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9432-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9432.146184242429462 (code B ref 9432); Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:21:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9432) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Apr 2016 11:20:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51355 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1avjzc-0007f8-8g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 07:20:24 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:35886) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1avjza-0007el-9k for 9432@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 07:20:22 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.1.64.getinternet.no ([84.215.1.64] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1avjzU-0001dO-8l; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 13:20:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 08 Sep 2011 22:17:43 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:117038 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> Yes, this use-case is rare, but there are other use-cases where >> something more than `display-buffer-reuse-frames' is necessary >> like described in http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2011-08/= msg00267.html > > I don't see how that goes against changing the default of > display-buffer-reuse-frames. The doc string of this variable is included below. Has whatever this bug report is talking about been fixed now? ---- display-buffer-reuse-frames is a variable defined in =91window.el=92. Its value is nil This variable is obsolete since 24.3; use a `reusable-frames' alist entry in `display-buffer-alist'. Documentation: Non-nil means =91display-buffer=92 should reuse frames. If the buffer in question is already displayed in a frame, raise that frame. --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no