Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de> writes:

> Nicolas Petton <nicolas@petton.fr> writes:
>
>> > `stream-scan' is useful and not redundant.
>
>> Yes, I get it now.  However I'm still a bit confused by its name.
>
> The name is borrowed from Haskell.  Other suggestions welcome.

I don't have any :)

> I don't understand what that means: how can "reduce" be lazy at all?  It
> needs to generate all stream elements to compute the requested value,
> and that at call time.

Of course, you're right!

Nico