Davis Herring writes: >> + error ("Autoloading failed to define function %s in file %s", > > I'd phrase it as "Autoloading file %s failed to define function %s". (It's a bit > odd to say the function is in the file when we've just learned it isn't.) > > Davis Thanks, I agree that it's better. I suppose I wanted to append rather than rewrite the message, but there's really no reason to hold back. The updated patches follow: