From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Stefan Huchler <stefan.huchler@mail.de>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help
Subject: Re: Strange eval behaviour
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 18:00:17 +0100
Message-ID: <87fumo67vi.fsf@mail.de>
References: <87vavrul0k.fsf@mail.de>
	<jwveg2em7f7.fsf-monnier+gmane.emacs.help@gnu.org>
	<878tsl1p7b.fsf@mail.de> <878tshjyvy.fsf@web.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1479488852 26528 195.159.176.226 (18 Nov 2016 17:07:32 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 17:07:32 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux)
To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 18 18:07:28 2016
Return-path: <help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17])
	by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1c7mdM-0005xB-7m
	for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 18:07:28 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38073 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1c7mdO-0000kS-3B
	for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 12:07:30 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60130)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org>) id 1c7mWj-0005Sy-U4
	for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 12:00:38 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org>) id 1c7mWf-0006cO-4D
	for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 12:00:38 -0500
Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=51461 helo=blaine.gmane.org)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1c7mWe-0006bz-Ue
	for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 12:00:33 -0500
Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org>) id 1c7mWU-0000dH-9x
	for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 18:00:22 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
Original-Lines: 14
Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:I97dCMRQaoL+zcVyta/7Ch2Wubw=
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
	[fuzzy]
X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 12:06:46 -0500
X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor <help-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/help-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnu-emacs/>
List-Post: <mailto:help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs"
	<help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:111743
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help/111743>

Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de> writes:

> AFAIR, you had a strange handling of variables in your code: some
> functions had used free variables that were declared nowhere.  Compiling
> is a good way to reveal such problems.

Hmm I dont misunderstand you, you are talking about the params varible I
assigned a few times with setq?

I saw that only as warnings again that should not cause problems.

Or did you refer here to something different you saw? bytecompiling only
throw warnings about this params variables. And thats only warnings...