Hello, Rasmus writes: > I'm not an expert of HTML either. However, the "p" tag inside the > "figure" is uncommon looking a bit on the example usages online. Thus, I > agree with Matt that it should probably not be there. OK. > AFAIK, the CSS selector still differs so on the output side they are not > alike. I.e. the former is "figure>img" the other is a "p>img". Aside: If > anything, removing the "p" tag inside the figure would make it easier to > handle images. So would the following patch fix the issue? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou