From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Bastien Guerry Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Commit 49c0ff2 "Don't bind org-agenda .." Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 10:34:02 +0200 Message-ID: <87fues8lqd.fsf@bzg.fr> References: <87a855of9m.fsf@bzg.fr> <87fuevdc6c.fsf@kyleam.com> <874lvbd50a.fsf@kyleam.com> <87efuftz3t.fsf@bzg.fr> <874lv9ivov.fsf@gmx.us> <8737aten05.fsf@detlef> <87vanp1x32.fsf@bzg.fr> <83zid1usph.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1498120548 22050 195.159.176.226 (22 Jun 2017 08:35:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 08:35:48 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/26.0 (gnu/linux) Cc: rasmus@gmx.us, johnw@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, mvoteiza@udel.edu, michael.albinus@gmx.de, mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr, kaushal.modi@gmail.com, kyle@kyleam.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 22 10:35:40 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dNxaU-0005C1-IE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 10:35:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57663 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dNxaX-00078D-VT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 04:35:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47042) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dNxZJ-0006L9-59 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 04:34:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dNxZI-0003Pt-He for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 04:34:25 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:41392) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dNxZ1-0003JC-NZ; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 04:34:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [78.192.157.63] (port=57486 helo=bzg.fr) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dNxYx-0007xG-LI; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 04:34:04 -0400 Original-Received: by bzg.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1138538BB75; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 10:34:02 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <83zid1usph.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 21 Jun 2017 21:00:10 +0300") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:215879 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > The value is that Emacs end-users who build a new tarball could run > tests if they want to make sure their build is working correctly. Fair enough. > Whether this is a reason good enough to justify the effort of adding > the tests to the Emacs repository, is your call, of course. It is a good reason to justify the effort of adding the test, but let's not make it a blocker for this merge, we can do it later. Thanks, -- Bastien