From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: libnettle/libhogweed WIP Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 15:43:53 -0400 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87fudyhkhy.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87r30qu5av.fsf@lifelogs.com> <874lxmtxyy.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87r30prvwt.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8337d4csez.fsf@gnu.org> <87r30nq9el.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83inlyc1k2.fsf@gnu.org> <87inlyrfni.fsf@lifelogs.com> <837f2eb845.fsf@gnu.org> <87ziedpyy1.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83d1b75u8a.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2znntaq.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87o9u8q4a5.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83tw3xbklg.fsf@gnu.org> <87zictm415.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83podoqchd.fsf@gnu.org> <87podnnbi2.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8760ewi3rw.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87r2xjgilq.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83iniug7ql.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1500061465 27019 195.159.176.226 (14 Jul 2017 19:44:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 19:44:25 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 14 21:44:21 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dW6Vc-0006a6-74 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 21:44:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39645 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dW6Vh-00024R-IN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 15:44:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38215) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dW6VW-0001yJ-J5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 15:44:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dW6VR-00047V-SR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 15:44:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=40811 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dW6VR-00046s-Ll for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 15:44:05 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dW6VH-0005cc-LD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 21:43:55 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 28 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:/W4VC5+J3hcBhWcrhW55LOkVAvc= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:216659 Archived-At: On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 22:04:50 +0300 Eli Zaretskii wrote: EZ> I needed to add some Windows-specific code to get it to build on EZ> Windows. Oh, thank you. EZ> Also, the 7th test fails for me as below; any idea? EZ> Test test-gnutls-005-aead-ciphers condition: EZ> (ert-test-failed EZ> ((should EZ> (gnutls-tests-hexstring-equal input reverse)) EZ> :form EZ> (gnutls-tests-hexstring-equal " " " ► ► ∟\231\202 \200") EZ> :value nil)) EZ> FAILED 7/7 test-gnutls-005-aead-ciphers It works for me, on Ubuntu 17.04, GnuTLS 3.5.6 and a fresh checkout. Could you run with `make gnutls-tests GNUTLS_TEST_VERBOSE=1' and look at the output? This full output is normally silenced because it's so verbose, but in this case we'll need it because so many different test cases are attempted. (If there's a better way to control ERT verbosity, let me know.) Thanks Ted