From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#27141: 26.0.50; mml-generate-mime-1 broken Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 19:36:47 +0200 Message-ID: <87fubqzej4.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> References: <83ziadxkku.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1505324231 4177 195.159.176.226 (13 Sep 2017 17:37:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 17:37:11 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 27141@debbugs.gnu.org To: Katsumi Yamaoka Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 13 19:37:04 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dsBay-0000uz-2E for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 19:37:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43846 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dsBb5-0001mr-7p for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 13:37:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45878) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dsBaz-0001mh-Mq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 13:37:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dsBaw-0008Em-7O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 13:37:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:58214) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dsBaw-0008Ea-2j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 13:37:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dsBav-00032W-Ju for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 13:37:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 17:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27141 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 27141-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27141.150532421211669 (code B ref 27141); Wed, 13 Sep 2017 17:37:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 27141) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Sep 2017 17:36:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38662 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dsBam-000328-4w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 13:36:52 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:56201) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dsBak-000321-Gv for 27141@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 13:36:50 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.209.243.26.getinternet.no ([84.209.243.26] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dsBah-0004XA-Fw; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 19:36:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Katsumi Yamaoka's message of "Mon, 04 Sep 2017 08:37:26 +0900") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:136903 Archived-At: Katsumi Yamaoka writes: > Oh, I forgot to write the bottom line, sorry. It happend when I > forward a message in which the header contains non-ASCII letters. > What I did then (revno 8130d91) was reverting Lars' change. I'm > using the current version with no problem so far. Though I don't > know what Lars tried to fix, I think it is not a stopper for the > next release as there seems to be no bug report brought up about > it. Lars? I seem to have forgotten to tag my patch with the corresponding bug report? Annoying. Anyway, the problem my patch fixed was dealing with text files included in Message with mml tags -- they would (under some circumstances; there was a test case in the original bug report) be corrupted. But my fix was obviously a mistake, since it resulted in pretty much all multibyte buffers being mishandled when forwarding, so the original problem will have to be fixed in a different way. But I don't think this should be a release blocker. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no