From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28637: [PATCH] Display commit in package description, if available Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 19:58:32 -0400 Message-ID: <87fua9ct7b.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> References: <874lr6d3tp.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <871smacwln.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83wp42nf01.fsf@gnu.org> <87wp41c1as.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83o9pdomkm.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1508803174 15041 195.159.176.226 (23 Oct 2017 23:59:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 23:59:34 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.90 (gnu/linux) Cc: glasser@davidglasser.net, 28637@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 24 01:59:26 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e6mcl-0001fj-K9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 01:59:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40991 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e6mcs-0006dN-Jn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 19:59:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37325) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e6mcd-0006XT-PI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 19:59:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e6mcY-0006eV-UQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 19:59:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49468) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e6mcY-0006eF-Qm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 19:59:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e6mcY-0003t7-K7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 19:59:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 23:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28637 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 28637-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28637.150880312314899 (code B ref 28637); Mon, 23 Oct 2017 23:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28637) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Oct 2017 23:58:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58147 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e6mcF-0003sF-HX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 19:58:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-io0-f169.google.com ([209.85.223.169]:43232) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e6mcD-0003rx-KN for 28637@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 19:58:41 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-io0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 134so21987517ioo.0 for <28637@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 16:58:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=Dg2oawPUdBteVMG4vfl6/hNk/vPjX3HltJwa0JApmew=; b=n1WddIRCTF82fTM4OX4Un78ZZBWCTW+o/Wd5vs0Wi86jOSJn5jKolwMp/zJyVrzS4k UO+6TpdY2Gq91+ptNISnI9aCvK4ykIQYKEZcJYzLYuSGJkbgOOleOSKe4LO/74PzcGal jnE0xdrU0ZnRk5Uilxw/rAXCxgcn/AC4jGxSP1P5MH8sBF0SEFd9emJYHKCJ3chvgHfd TN/gBQ94iaNbz2c18/n7slztgUcgUap6MZmZYT7fO95Y/uKWDuK/i1o9okirKHiq5aJa +1a/Y9BAjC9g6mLeiB5dFTsmo6FeR42m3Ftodm6YUpSVkqMnxIduLfUq4FzuyjJihKlo xQcA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=Dg2oawPUdBteVMG4vfl6/hNk/vPjX3HltJwa0JApmew=; b=eFJqV2bYzLi5iJj2+y4O5SDlJEjMcE90mABuCrYN+vWsdgyxSLxdRisuAjGU5HVQmr dFu6P2cj+9FVTU1pBs7Etq5AuS0Bxq8nK0Sj0GbeZ9QeZwWPojINFoeWQjGQvuUf+KNO HZYqqm5fm6VZvGWO/OSWs+SEDGvuAWSBFEDSG9A06hY2F33ZX38Te94BdJtXgmshjt9Z iKfszsEAe5AyFeBi0/7llz88U1Py3I/FNxqpS+K4YDZbpp56rNl6XXvmo8U+41BP53HZ REIXD4RyrPATq1dtgPkohqLmfiDR2QnbgFzBGq9SrxjhoLUGJxgazhUENHPEXhNUkeJU 1EXw== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaX/JQFLDc6p1F0dsST3o6zd1jNYEUTSwnhgHsgDQPRKv8BCiFEO zdmdv9KMOAmZ9WRgoO7SWgCp9Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+SthITCxSl0CYaXExNae1gyx2eXknLic/NgOIXByWaF9DBfRRpoRuSXc4JlqreYv0iSogUE5w== X-Received: by 10.107.83.4 with SMTP id h4mr20312788iob.145.1508803115578; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 16:58:35 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zebian ([45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id r65sm92445ith.1.2017.10.23.16.58.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 23 Oct 2017 16:58:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83o9pdomkm.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 11 Oct 2017 16:12:25 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:138914 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Then it could be okay for emacs-26, if its addition is deemed > important enough. >From my perspective as a package maintainer, it would be very useful to get the commit hash in bug reports. Getting a timestamp in place of a version from MELPA users has been a pretty long-standing source of minor irritation. So I would like to have this in Emacs 26 to end the irritation sooner rather than later. Obviously it's not vital, but it usefulness vs risk ratio seems to me high enough to be worth it.