From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [RFC] Moving "manual.org" into core Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 15:26:16 +0100 Message-ID: <87fu5e4n07.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87bmhooaj9.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87y3j8dw45.fsf@bzg.fr> <87lgf8f93b.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87r2p0un5c.fsf@bzg.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55127) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1esr4J-0003tt-O1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2018 09:26:24 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1esr4I-0000fE-Vs for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2018 09:26:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87r2p0un5c.fsf@bzg.fr> (Bastien Guerry's message of "Sun, 04 Mar 2018 11:54:07 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Bastien Guerry Cc: Glenn Morris , Achim Gratz , Org Mode List Bastien Guerry writes: > So when we make the move, we publish 9.2 by merging master in maint > and edit orgmanual.org from both maint and master. Correct? Correct, but I don't know what "orgmanual.org" you are talking about. You recently re-introduced a file named "orgmanual.org" in contrib/ alongside "manual.org". The former is apparently outdated. > It is not about setting a time window: we just need to be careful with > this move and discuss it. One week seems fine. As pointed out in another message, I do not understand what carefulness is needed. I suggest to replace "org.texi" with ... "org.texi". The only difference lies in how we edit it, which concerns a handful of persons in the world.