Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

Hi Eli,

>> >> The function returns a number, which counts the connections this Emacs
>> >> session has established to the BUS under the same unique name
>> >
>> > However:
>> >
>> > (dbus-init-bus :system)
>> >
>> > ==> ((:signal :system "org.freedesktop.DBus.Local" "Disconnected") (nil "/org/freedesktop/DBus/Local" dbus-handle-bus-disconnect))
>> >
>> > Looking at the definition of `dbus-init-bus', it seems that only a
>> > `prog1' form is missing to make the docstring correct:
>> >
>> >   (prog1 (dbus--init-bus ...) (dbus-register-signal ...))
>>
>> Indeed. dbus--init-bus keeps the original implementation of dbus-init-bus.
>> It would be safe to apply this patch even to the emacs-26 branch, IMHO.
>>
>> Eli?
>
> ENOPATCH

My question was, whether we could apply the proposed change to the
emacs-26 branch. What else are you missing? The patch itself? It's
obvious from Philipp's message, but here it is: