bug#34655: 26.1.92; Segfault in module with --module-assertions

["Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob@tcd.ie>]

Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2@gmail.com> writes:

> Am Do., 21. März 2019 um 19:28 Uhr schrieb Philipp Stephani
> <p.stephani2@gmail.com>:
>>
>> Am Do., 21. März 2019 um 18:00 Uhr schrieb Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>:
>> >
>> > > From: Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2@gmail.com>
>> > > Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 17:11:41 +0100
>> > > Cc: "Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob@tcd.ie>, 34655@debbugs.gnu.org
>> > >
>> > > I haven't checked everything in detail, but my impression is that this
>> > > is rather another instance of bug#31238. Fixing this only when module
>> > > assertions are enabled will probably not fix anything, but rather mask
>> > > issues. Reverting commit 3eb93c07f7a60ac9ce8a16f10c3afd5a3a31243a is
>> > > still the right approach here. Can you please hold off a bit? I've
>> > > almost completed the revert, but haven't pushed it yet. Once that's in
>> > > we can check whether it also fixes this issue.
>> >
>> > I will CC Stefan, who committed 3eb93c07f7a60ac9ce8a16f10c3afd5a3a31243a.
>> >
>> > I'm not sure we should revert that; we could instead add GC protection
>> > for those parts that need it.
>>
>> Yes, that's what reverting that commit does :-)
>> We need to mark the objects in all cases, not just when module
>> assertions are enabled.
>> Note that both the designer of the module API (Daniel) and I as one of
>> its main implementers disagree with commit
>> 3eb93c07f7a60ac9ce8a16f10c3afd5a3a31243a. I'm happy to discuss
>> alternatives, but for now we should revert it and discuss the
>> alternatives *before* implementing them. I've already confirmed that
>> reverting commit 3eb93c07f7a60ac9ce8a16f10c3afd5a3a31243a fixes
>> bug#31238, and I can try it with this bug as well.
>
> I wasn't able to reproduce bug#34655 myself (these things tend to be
> rather flaky), but I've now reverted commit
> 3eb93c07f7a60ac9ce8a16f10c3afd5a3a31243a, and at least bug#31238 is
> now consistently fixed (for me at least). Basil, can you check whether
> you can still reproduce bug#34655 with the current master?

FWIW, I cannot reproduce bug#34655 after reverting Stefan's commit.

Thanks,

-- 
Basil