From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35044: 25.2; Description of "disappearing" faces (Emacs Manual) Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 17:20:58 -0400 Message-ID: <87ftq3p2kl.fsf@gmail.com> References: <875zr9vf90.fsf@gmail.com> <87a7ghsqms.fsf@gmail.com> <91458fc2-3478-998d-f34d-ae2145d07936@gmail.com> <87a7gdq6ca.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="137306"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) Cc: 35044@debbugs.gnu.org To: Sebastian Urban Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 27 23:22:10 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hKUlu-000Zc4-Jv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 23:22:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36444 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hKUlt-0006G2-HT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 17:22:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56181) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hKUln-0006Fs-KC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 17:22:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hKUlm-0006qv-NW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 17:22:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50833) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hKUlm-0006qi-Jm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 17:22:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hKUlm-0004ga-9V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 17:22:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 21:22:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35044 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 35044-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35044.155640006817940 (code B ref 35044); Sat, 27 Apr 2019 21:22:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35044) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Apr 2019 21:21:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36144 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hKUku-0004fH-5M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 17:21:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qt1-f182.google.com ([209.85.160.182]:43920) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hKUkr-0004eQ-O8 for 35044@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 17:21:06 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qt1-f182.google.com with SMTP id g4so8000921qtq.10 for <35044@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 14:21:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=5ybcxKNNC9QB2Or1UsBEWY/ghiOLyo1irMd/HZEOJZs=; b=Zsxm6nENuQwtwsW6o7ecWp4pZaLtavE/4+nIzWam3uHh6lI3pZI3/jI8Dm+nUwq4wU lbwi6iYvXshw/7KtSHjyFLoT7wSleMUzs88tG5d4z2RygpyLVQmWMgkoPPTa2LCxG6AP R63BrxSWEK9hdRz/TjygLerMYZXWWlwFlBwbz6nYDT3Q236E4ibR/uhim3Iakki8bU9C QXO85B8/ZLxjQR0179CGOiu9rHsREOqewQSY8y+HAp2FziHvaJL1GgmckmcLJ+k/ZA6a xewl9ADIuSWKron+fAnIL0sNuv5aVNiEVjChJ+Wf7L1TWMVOMjPZoiSR5ys3DclTsUvz Iq4Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=5ybcxKNNC9QB2Or1UsBEWY/ghiOLyo1irMd/HZEOJZs=; b=ojjAvOKZiwUB3wxgh57+5jwaDCjuNzpUZTSvuvyyO/xrHKZP2k4aFrBwfgtbftAScn fMv7cbS1tywgOvVcfYorgz5NY/Nf8MO4Ada1IDNdYNMsEPhfP4qezVL0ju1UMCdxlVTH LRyhcf/QeDGP+UV1BsGJ1kszEE6R0FZcTF/aLGmykJf6HbDWLjfgbFx7lR92jMLkbE+k JkHCFkVY+fYlodLV1Tw/MbkgVbHdm/DL4kFYJeomzGmTLUCBJNL4yNdsJTlofL6pdo66 K4QhmigQbk6sXcZr8blc2Xh3betBxzefGUQVYwGtY9jbwIc3ASAopuei5XJaxut0N3mQ 7brw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUn/C2bBX7hd3aNIbiADZwTHTb951HiUZw96nnevqqC0TTKxHaM qXA4XNg3+Arqsevv+0RomiIdErCF X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxXLMkPndUMroTI+pBtfXt0FPKkA+bSR/Q0xcY+j4E1dm++XclJC0Vkq3Nf8/UXHYWfjz712Q== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:35c6:: with SMTP id l6mr32245747qtb.326.1556400060081; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 14:21:00 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from minid (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id s64sm15189361qkc.39.2019.04.27.14.20.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 27 Apr 2019 14:20:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Sebastian Urban's message of "Sat, 27 Apr 2019 17:55:55 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:158380 Archived-At: Sebastian Urban writes: > To sum things up, approach for this bug won't be updating "Emacs > manual", because it could end up as an excuse for bug(s), but rather: > > 1. updating "Elisp manual" with advice to use 'font-lock-face' over > 'face' (which you already did with patch) - dev pov, > > 2. updating "table.el" to use 'font-lock-face' instead 'face' - user > pov. Yes. > But won't it (especially point 2.) start a "face hunt", because there > may be other functions/modes that have the same problem - using 'face' > when they should use 'font-lock-face'... or should I just don't care > until it happen? Yes, it's quite possible that other functions/modes have the same problem. But there's no need to specifically hunt them down (unless you want to).